Allowing Normal Food at Will After Major Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Does Not Increase Morbidity: A Randomized Multicenter Trial
Abstract
Objective The aim of this trial was to investigate whether a routine of allowing normal food at will increases morbidity after major upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. Summary background data Nil-by-mouth with enteral tube feeding is widely practiced for several days after major upper GI surgery. After other abdominal operations, normal food at will has been shown to be safe and to improve gut function. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to a routine of nil-by-mouth and enteral tube feeding by needle-catheter jejunostomy (ETF group) or normal food at will from the first day after major upper GI surgery. Primary end point was rate of major complications and death. Secondary outcomes were minor complications and adverse events, bowel function, and length of stay. All patients were invited to a follow-up at 8 weeks after discharge from the hospital. Results Four hundred fifty-three patients who underwent major open upper GI surgery in 5 centers were enrolled between 2001 and 2006. Four hundred forty-seven patients were correctly randomized. Of 227 patients 76 (33.5%) had major complications in the ETF group compared with 62 (28.2%) of 220 patients allowed normal food at will (P = 0.26, 95% CI for the difference in rate from -3.3 to 13.9). In the ETF group, 36 (15.9%) patients were reoperated compared with 29 (13.2%) in the group allowed normal food at will (P = 0.50) and 30-day mortality was 10 (4.4%) of 227 and 11 (5.0%) of 220 patients, respectively (P = 0.83). Time to…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Early resumption of oral intake does not diminish the duration of postoperative ileus or lead to a significantly increased rate of nasogastric tube reinsertion.
“Early resumption of oral intake”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [207]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 313
- Authors
- Lassen, K., Kjæve, J., Fetveit, T., Tranø, G., Sigurdsson, H. K., Horn, A., & Revhaug, A.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
- Sørlandet Hospital Arendal (NO)
- St Olav's University Hospital (NO)
- Stavanger University Hospital (NO)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Lassen, Kristoffer
- Kjæve, Jørn
- Revhaug, Arthur
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 247
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 721-729
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094027869
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Keywords
- early oral feeding, nil per os, enteral nutrition, needle catheter jejunostomy, upper gastrointestinal surgery, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, bowel function, length of hospital stay, postoperative reoperation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Eating, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Food, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Care, Postoperative Complications, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Volition, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review