Cited by 91Organ Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesLiver Disease and TransplantationTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Prolonged waiting times for liver transplantation in obese patients

Segev, Dorry L., Thompson, Richard E., Locke, Jayme E., Simpkins, Christopher E., Thuluvath, Paul J., Montgomery, Robert A., Maley, Warren R.·2008·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the independent association between obesity and access to liver transplantation. BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with higher complication rates, longer hospitalization, and worse survival after liver transplantation. Nevertheless, transplantation provides survival benefit to patients with end-stage liver disease, regardless of body mass index (BMI). We hypothesized that, despite survival benefit, providers were reluctant to transplant obese patients because of the inherent difficulty of these cases and their inferior outcomes. Our goal was to quantify the independent association between BMI and waiting time for orthotopic liver transplantation as a surrogate marker for this reluctance. METHODS: We studied 29,136 wait-list candidates in the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) era, categorized as severely obese (BMI 35-40), morbidly obese (BMI 40-60), and reference (BMI 18.5-35). All models were adjusted for factors relevant to the allocation system, factors possibly influencing access to healthcare, and factors biologically related to disease progression and outcomes. RESULTS: The odds of receiving a MELD exception were 30% lower in severely obese and 38% lower in morbidly obese patients. Similarly, the likelihoods of being turned down for an organ were 10% and 16% higher, and the rates of being transplanted were 11% and 29% lower in severely obese and morbidly obese patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current practice seems to indicate a reluctance to transplant obese patients. If indeed as a community we feel that liver allografts should not be distributed to patients with excessive postoperative risk, we should consider expressing this as a formal change to our allocation policy rather than through informal practice patterns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e31818a01ef

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 91

Authors
Segev, D. L., Thompson, R. E., Locke, J. E., Simpkins, C. E., Thuluvath, P. J., Montgomery, R. A., & Maley, W. R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Segev, Dorry L.
  • Locke, Jayme E.
  • Simpkins, Christopher E.
  • Montgomery, Robert A.
  • Maley, Warren R.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2008-11
Volume
248
Issue
5
Pages
863-870
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967359433
Cited by
91
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (234-2005-370011 C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
obesity, liver transplantation, transplant waiting time, body mass index, organ allocation policy, MELD exception, end-stage liver disease, access to transplantation, morbid obesity
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Fatty Liver, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Hepatitis C, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Obesity, Morbid, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Regression Analysis, Waiting Lists, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Liver Transplantation, Liver Failure, Patient Selection, Resource Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review