The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complications, Failure to Rescue, and Mortality With Major Inpatient Surgery in Medicare Patients
Abstract
In Brief Objective: We sought to determine whether hospital variations in surgical mortality were due to differences in complication rates or failure to rescue rates (ie, case-fatality rates in patients with a complication). Background: Wide variations in mortality after major surgery are becoming increasingly apparent. The clinical mechanisms underling these variations are largely unexplored. Methods: We studied all Medicare beneficiaries undergoing 6 major operations in 2005 to 2006: pancreatectomy, esophagectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, and mitral valve replacement. We ranked hospitals according to risk-adjusted mortality and divided them into 5 equal groups. We then compared the incidence of complications and rates of failure to rescue between the top 20% of hospitals (“best”) and bottom 20% of hospitals (“worst”). Analyses were conducted for all operations combined and for each individual procedure. Results: For all 6 operations combined, the worst hospitals had mortality rates 2.5-fold higher than the best hospitals (8.0% vs. 3.0%). However, complication rates were similar at worst and best hospitals (36.4% vs. 32.7%). In contrast, failure to rescue rates were much higher at the worst compared with the best hospitals (16.7% vs. 6.8%). These findings persisted in analyses with individual operations and specific complications. Conclusions: Reducing variations in mortality will require strategies to improve the ability of high-mortality hospitals to manage postoperative complications. Surgical mortality rates vary widely across hospitals. Excess mortality at poorly performing hospitals appears to be attributable to large differences in failure to rescue, but only small differences in the incidence of complications. Improvements in surgical quality will require strategies to improve the ability of poorly performing hospitals to better recognize and manage complications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.
Elixhauser, A., Steiner, C., Harris, D. R., & Coffey, R. M. (1998) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004 · Cited by 9,921
Cited by
Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US
Makary, M. A., & Daniel, M. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i2139 · Cited by 3,264
Toward a Consensus on Centralization in Surgery
Vonlanthen, R., Lodge, P., Barkun, J. S., Farges, O., Rogiers, X., Soreide, K., Kehlet, H., Reynolds, J. V., Käser, S. A., Naredi, P., et al. (2018) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002965 · Cited by 274
Self-citationChiew, C. J., Liu, N., Wong, T. H., Sim, Y. E., & Abdullah, H. R. (2020) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000003297 · Cited by 151
Merath, K., Hyer, J. M., Mehta, R., Farooq, A., Bagante, F., Sahara, K., Tsilimigras, D. I., Beal, E., Paredes, A. Z., Wu, L., et al. (2020) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-019-04338-2 · Cited by 131
Scarborough (2012) · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e31826578fb · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghaferi, A. A., Birkmeyer, J. D., & Dimick, J. B.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 250
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1029-1034
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041653029
- Cited by
- 807
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complications, Failure to Rescue, and Mortality With Major Inpatient Surgery in Medicare Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bef697
- The paper
- Ghaferi, A. A., Birkmeyer, J. D., & Dimick, J. B. (2009). Complications, Failure to Rescue, and Mortality With Major Inpatient Surgery in Medicare Patients. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bef697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.