Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictors of the Presence of Concomitant Invasive Ductal Carcinoma in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas

Ingkakul, Thun, Sadakari, Yoshihiko, Ienaga, Jun, Satoh, Norihiro, Takahata, Shunichi, Tanaka, Masao·2010·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: Invasive ductal carcinoma (DC) of the pancreas arising as an independent lesion in association with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) has occasionally been reported. However, clinicopathological features related to the presence of DC in patients with IPMN remain largely unknown. The purpose of the present study was to determine the factors predicting the presence of concomitant DC in those with IPMN. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of a consecutive series of 236 patients with IPMN treated by surgical resection or followed up at our institution between January 1987 and June 2008. In an attempt to identify predictors for the presence of DC, clinicopathological variables were compared between IPMN patients with concomitant DC and those without concomitant DC. Results: Of 236 patients with IPMN, concomitant DC was detected synchronously or metachronously in 22 patients (9.3%). All the 22 IPMNs were of branch duct type and histological grades of 12 resected IPMNs were adenoma(n = 8) and borderline (n = 4). Multivariate analysis revealed 2 significant predictive factors for the presence of DC in IPMN, including worsening diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001) and an abnormal serum CA 19–9 level (P = 0.024). Conclusion: In view of the high prevalence of DC careful inspection of the entire pancreatic gland is necessary for early detection of DC in patients with branch duct IPMNs, especially when worsening diabetes mellitus and an abnormal serum CA 19–9 level are manifested. Ductal carcinoma of the pancreas occurred in 9.3% of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm patients as an independent lesion. Careful inspection of the entire pancreas is necessary for early detection of ductal carcinoma in patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms associated with worsening diabetes and high serum CA 19–9 levels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181c5ddc3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Ingkakul, T., Sadakari, Y., Ienaga, J., Satoh, N., Takahata, S., & Tanaka, M.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2010-01
Volume
251
Issue
1
Pages
70-75
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066974601
Cited by
190
References
1
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of the Presence of Concomitant Invasive Ductal Carcinoma in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181c5ddc3
The paper
Ingkakul, T., Sadakari, Y., Ienaga, J., Satoh, N., Takahata, S., & Tanaka, M. (2010). Predictors of the Presence of Concomitant Invasive Ductal Carcinoma in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181c5ddc3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.