Cited by 758Gastric Cancer Management and OutcomesEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Interim Report—A Phase III Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial (KLASS Trial)

Open access

Abstract

In Brief Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of this trial with respect to morbidity and mortality. Summary Background Data: Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is rapidly gaining popularity. However, there is limited evidence regarding its oncologic safety. We therefore conducted a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized study comparing LADG with open gastrectomy (ODG). Methods: Patient eligibility criteria were pathologically-proven adenocarcinoma, 20 to 80 years of age, preoperative stage I, no history of other cancer, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. The primary end point was to determine whether there is a difference in overall survival between 2 groups. The morbidity and mortality were compared to evaluate the safety of this trial. The time was decided on the hypothesis that the morbidity of this trial was not significantly different from that of previous reports on open gastric cancer surgeries (17%–20%). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov and carries the following ID number: NCT00452751. Results: A total of 342 patients were randomized (LADG, 179 patients; ODG, 161 patients) between January 1, 2006 and July 19, 2007. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in age, gender, and comorbidities. The postoperative complication rates of the LADG and ODG groups were 10.5% (17/179) and 14.7% (24/163), respectively (P = 0.137). Reoperations were required in 3 cases each group. The postoperative mortality was 1.1% (2/179) and 0% (0/163) in the LADG and ODG groups (P = 0.497), respectively. Conclusion: There was no significance difference in the morbidity and mortality between the 2 groups. Therefore, we conclude that this trial is safe and is thus ongoing. Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is rapidly gaining in popularity. However, there is limited evidence regarding its oncologic safety. We conducted a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized study comparing LADG with open gastrectomy. We found no significance difference in the morbidity and mortality between the LADG and open gastrectomy groups. Therefore, we conclude that this trial was safe and is thus ongoing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181cc8f6b

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kitano, 1994, Laparoscopic-assisted Billroth gastrectomy., Surg Laparosc Endosc, 4, 146
  2. 2004, Nationwide survey on endoscopic surgery in Japan [in Japanese]., J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg, 9, 475

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 758

Metadata

Authors
Kim, H.-H., Hyung, W. J., Cho, G. S., Kim, M. C., Han, S.-U., Kim, W., Ryu, S.-W., Lee, H.-J., & Song, K. Y.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Soonchunhyang University (KR)
  • Dong-A University (KR)
  • Ajou University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Kim, Hyung-Ho
  • Ryu, Seung-Wan
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2010-03
Volume
251
Issue
3
Pages
417-420
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078729562
Cited by
758
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 56
FWCI
48.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • KUMeL Repository (Keimyung University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy, open gastrectomy, gastric cancer, postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality, postoperative complications, surgical safety, adenocarcinoma, overall survival, reoperation, early gastric cancer, oncological safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Gastrectomy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Stomach Neoplasms, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review