Postoperative Handover: Problems, Pitfalls, and Prevention of Error
Abstract
Objective To identify the information transfer and communication problems in postoperative handover and to develop and validate a novel protocol for standardizing this communication. Background Effective clinical handover ensures continuity of patient care. Patient handovers within surgical units are largely informal. A thorough understanding of the problem is vital to develop standardized protocols. Methods A qualitative semistructured interview study was conducted with 18 healthcare professionals to uncover the problems with postoperative handover and to identify solutions, including components of a postoperative handover protocol. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and submitted to emergent theme analysis. Multiple blind coders were used to ensure triangulation and reliability of the coding process. A Delphi method was used to elicit consensus from a group of 50 surgical professionals so as to validate the handover protocol. Results Many of the information transfer and communication failures at the postoperative phase are deemed to be due to an incomplete handover. All the interviewed healthcare professionals agreed that postoperative handover should be structured in the form of a standardized protocol so as to prevent omissions of any critical information. Based on this, 28 items were submitted to the Delphi process. Of these, 21 items had a mean importance score greater than 4.0 and were included in the final postoperative handover proforma under the followi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Incomplete or inaccurate handoffs are a source of subsequent medical errors and patient injury, particularly for patients undergoing major surgery.
“Incomplete or inaccurate handoffs are a source of subsequent medical errors and patient injury,1–3 particularly for patients undergoing major surgery.4–7”
From Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 147
- Authors
- Nagpal, K., Arora, S., Abboudi, M., Vats, A., Wong, H. W., Manchanda, C., Vincent, C., & Moorthy, K.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 252
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 171-176
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019334771
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 13.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/D069718/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
- Keywords
- patient handover, continuity of care, information transmission, communication breakdown, surgical wards, Delphi consensus
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Continuity of Patient Care, Delphi Technique, Interprofessional Relations, Interviews as Topic, Patient Transfer, Postoperative Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review