The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Randomized Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) has eliminated the need for axillary dissection (ALND) in patients whose sentinel node (SN) is tumor-free. However, completion ALND for patients with tumor-involved SNs remains the standard to achieve locoregional control. Few studies have examined the outcome of patients who do not undergo ALND for positive SNs. We now report local and regional recurrence information from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial. METHODS: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 was a prospective trial examining survival of patients with SN metastases detected by standard H and E, who were randomized to undergo ALND after SLND versus SLND alone without specific axillary treatment. Locoregional recurrence was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 446 patients randomized to SLND alone and 445 to SLND + ALND. Patients in the 2 groups were similar with respect to age, Bloom-Richardson score, estrogen receptor status, use of adjuvant systemic therapy, tumor type, T stage, and tumor size. Patients randomized to SLND + ALND had a median of 17 axillary nodes removed compared with a median of only 2 SN removed with SLND alone (P < 0.001). ALND also removed more positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001). At a median follow-up time of 6.3 years, there were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence (P = 0.11) or regional recurrence (P = 0.45) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the potential for residual axillary disease after SLND, SLND without ALND can offer excellent regional control and may be reasonable management for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant systemic therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment
Morrow, M., Waters, J., & Morris, E. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61350-0 · Cited by 448
Self-citationBreast cancer-related lymphedema: risk factors, precautionary measures, and treatments
Gillespie, T. C., Sayegh, H. E., Brunelle, C. L., Daniell, K. M., & Taghian, A. G. (2018) · Gland Surgery · doi:10.21037/gs.2017.11.04 · Cited by 361
Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: A review
Taghian, N. R., Miller, C. L., Jammallo, L. S., O’Toole, J., & Skolny, M. N. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.06.004 · Cited by 333
Wang, L., Cohen, J. C., Devasenapathy, N., Hong, B. Y., Kheyson, S., Lu, D., Oparin, Y., Kennedy, S. A., Romerosa, B., Arora, N., et al. (2020) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.088 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Giuliano, A. E., McCall, L., Beitsch, P., Whitworth, P. W., Blumencranz, P., Leitch, A. M., Saha, S., Hunt, K. K., Morrow, M., & Ballman, K.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 252
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 426-433
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070281077
- Cited by
- 1,263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f08f32
- The paper
- Giuliano, A. E., McCall, L., Beitsch, P., Whitworth, P. W., Blumencranz, P., Leitch, A. M., Saha, S., Hunt, K. K., Morrow, M., & Ballman, K. (2010). Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Randomized Trial. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f08f32
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.