Diagnostic Accuracy and Receiver-Operating Characteristics Curve Analysis in Surgical Research and Decision Making
Abstract
In surgical research, the ability to correctly classify one type of condition or specific outcome from another is of great importance for variables influencing clinical decision making. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis is a useful tool in assessing the diagnostic accuracy of any variable with a continuous spectrum of results. In order to rule a disease state in or out with a given test, the test results are usually binary, with arbitrarily chosen cut-offs for defining disease versus health, or for grading of disease severity. In the postgenomic era, the translation from bench-to-bedside of biomarkers in various tissues and body fluids requires appropriate tools for analysis. In contrast to predetermining a cut-off value to define disease, the advantages of applying ROC analysis include the ability to test diagnostic accuracy across the entire range of variable scores and test outcomes. In addition, ROC analysis can easily examine visual and statistical comparisons across tests or scores. ROC is also favored because it is thought to be independent from the prevalence of the condition under investigation. ROC analysis is used in various surgical settings and across disciplines, including cancer research, biomarker assessment, imaging evaluation, and assessment of risk scores.With appropriate use, ROC curves may help identify the most appropriate cutoff value for clinical and surgical decision making and avoid confounding effects seen with subjective rating…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ROC curves use the average performance across all thresholds, including those not used in clinical practice, which can limit their clinical relevance.
“However, since ROC curves use the average performance across all thresholds, including those not used in clinical practice, this can limit their clinical relevance.”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [198]
Because ROC analysis doesn't consider disease prevalence, it can lead to interpretation bias and may not accurately reflect real-world settings.
“Additionally, because ROC analysis doesn’t consider disease prevalence, it can lead to interpretation bias and may not accurately reflect real-world settings [198,199].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [198]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 97 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Søreide, K., Kørner, H., & Søreide, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Stavanger University Hospital (NO)
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 253
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-34
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123554262
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- receiver operating characteristic, diagnostic accuracy, biomarkers, surgical decision-making, risk score, disease severity classification, surgical research
- MeSH terms
- Decision Making, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Patient Selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review