The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis of high-quality published trials, randomized and observational, comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for gastric cancer. BACKGROUND: Controversy persists about the clinical utility of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of gastric cancer. Prospective data is limited to a few small randomized trails. METHODS: : Studies published from January 1992 to March 2010 that compare LDG and ODG were identified. No restrictions in pathologic stage were applied. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Selection of high-quality, nonrandomized comparative studies (NRCTs) was based on a validated tool (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies). Mortality, complications, harvested lymph nodes, operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were compared using weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included in the analyses, 6 RCTs and 19 NRCTs, compromising 3055 patients (1658 LDG, 1397 ODG). LDG was associated with longer operative times (WMD 48.3 minutes; P < 0.001) and lower overall complications (OR 0.59; P < 0.001), medical complications (OR 0.49; P = 0.002), minor surgical complications (OR 0.62; P = 0.001), estimated blood loss (WMD -118.9 mL; P < 0.001), and hospital stay (WMD -3.6 days; P < 0.001). Mortality and major complications were similar. Patients in the ODG group had a significantly higher number of lymph nodes harvested (WMD 3.9 nodes; P < 0.001), although the estimated proportion of patients with less than 15 retrieved nodes was similar (OR 1.26, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: LDG can be performed safely with a shorter hospital stay and fewer complications than open surgery. The long-term significance of a difference of less than 5 nodes in the number of harvested lymph nodes remains unclear. Lymph node staging appears to be unaffected. These results need to be validated in Western patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136 · Cited by 10,349
Slim, K., Nini, E., Forestier, D., Kwiatkowski, F., Panis, Y., & Chipponi, J. (2003) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x · Cited by 7,603
Kjaergard, L. L., Villumsen, J., & Gluud, C. (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-11-200112040-00010 · Cited by 2,283
Gotoda, T., Yanagisawa, A., Sasako, M., Ono, H., Nakanishi, Y., Shimoda, T., & Kato, Y. (2000) · Gastric Cancer · doi:10.1007/pl00011720 · Cited by 1,791
Songun, I., Putter, H., Kranenbarg, E. M.-K., Sasako, M., & van de Velde, C. J. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70070-x · Cited by 1,765
(2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70310-3 · Cited by 1,429
Ficarra, V., Novara, G., Artibani, W., Cestari, A., Galfano, A., Graefen, M., Guazzoni, G., Guillonneau, B., Menon, M., Montorsi, F., et al. (2009) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036 · Cited by 1,035
Huscher, C. G. S., Mingoli, A., Sgarzini, G., Sansonetti, A., Di Paola, M., Recher, A., & Ponzano, C. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000151892.35922.f2 · Cited by 860
Kim, H.-H., Hyung, W. J., Cho, G. S., Kim, M. C., Han, S.-U., Kim, W., Ryu, S.-W., Lee, H.-J., & Song, K. Y. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181cc8f6b · Cited by 758
Cited by
Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy
Mortensen, K., Nilsson, M., Slim, K., Schäfer, M., Mariette, C., Braga, M., Carli, F., Demartines, N., Griffin, S. M., Lassen, K., et al. (2014) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9582 · Cited by 767
Kim, W., Kim, H.-H., Han, S.-U., Kim, M.-C., Hyung, W. J., Ryu, S. W., Cho, G. S., Kim, C. Y., Yang, H.-K., Park, D. J., et al. (2016) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000001346 · Cited by 630
Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review
Buia, A., Stockhausen, F., & Hanisch, E. (2015) · World Journal of Methodology · doi:10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.238 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Viñuela, E. F., Gonen, M., Brennan, M. F., Coit, D. G., & Strong, V. E.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 255
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 446-456
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019140206
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 24.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e31824682f4
- The paper
- Viñuela, E. F., Gonen, M., Brennan, M. F., Coit, D. G., & Strong, V. E. (2012). Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31824682f4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.