Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Margin Status Remains an Important Determinant of Survival After Surgical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Chemotherapy

Open access
Andreou, Andreas, Aloia, Thomas A., Brouquet, Antoine, Dickson, Paxton V., Zimmitti, Giuseppe, Maru, Dipen M., Kopetz, Scott, Loyer, Evelyne M., Curley, Steven A., Abdalla, Eddie K., Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas·2013·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To determine the impact of surgical margin status on overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after modern preoperative chemotherapy. Background: In the era of effective chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases, the association between surgical margin status and survival has become controversial. Methods: Clinicopathologic data and outcomes for 378 patients treated with modern preoperative chemotherapy and hepatectomy were analyzed. The effect of positive margins on OS was analyzed in relation to pathologic and computed tomography–based morphologic response to chemotherapy. Results: Fifty-two of 378 resections (14%) were R1 resections (tumor-free margin <1 mm). The 5-year OS rates for patients with R0 resection (margin ≥1 mm) and R1 resection were 55% and 26%, respectively (P = 0.017). Multivariate analysis identified R1 resection (P = 0.03) and a minor pathologic response to chemotherapy (P = 0.002) as the 2 factors independently associated with worse survival. The survival benefit associated with negative margins (R0 vs R1 resection) was greater in patients with suboptimal morphologic response (5-year OS rate: 62% vs 11%; P = 0.007) than in patients with optimal response (3-year OS rate: 92% vs 88%; P = 0.917) and greater in patients with a minor pathologic response (5-year OS rate: 46% vs 0%; P = 0.002) than in patients with a major response (5-year OS rate: 63% vs 67%; P = 0.587). Conclusions: In the era of modern chemotherapy, negative margins remain an important determinant of survival and should be the primary goal of surgical therapy. The impact of positive margins is most pronounced in patients with suboptimal response to systemic therapy. In this era of effective chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases, the association between surgical margin status after resection of colorectal liver metastases and survival has become controversial. We show here that a negative margin remains an important determinant of survival and should be the primary goal of surgical therapy in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases. The impact of positive margins is most pronounced in patients with a suboptimal response to systemic therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e318283a4d1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Andreou, A., Aloia, T. A., Brouquet, A., Dickson, P. V., Zimmitti, G., Maru, D. M., Kopetz, S., Loyer, E. M., Curley, S. A., Abdalla, E. K., & Vauthey, J.-N.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2013-06
Volume
257
Issue
6
Pages
1079-1088
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967591571
Cited by
204
References
1
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Margin Status Remains an Important Determinant of Survival After Surgical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e318283a4d1
The paper
Andreou, A., Aloia, T. A., Brouquet, A., Dickson, P. V., Zimmitti, G., Maru, D. M., Kopetz, S., Loyer, E. M., Curley, S. A., Abdalla, E. K., & Vauthey, J.-N. (2013). Margin Status Remains an Important Determinant of Survival After Surgical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Chemotherapy. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318283a4d1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.