The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preoperative Smoking Status and Postoperative Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
In Brief Objective: To systematically review and summarize the evidence of an association between preoperative smoking status and postoperative complications elaborated on complication type. Background: The conclusions of studies examining the association between preoperative smoking and postoperative complications are inconsistent, thus there is a need for a review and meta-analysis to summarize the existing evidence. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on a search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Included were original studies of the association between smoking status and postoperative complications occurring within 30 days of operation. In total, 9354 studies were identified and reviewed for eligibility and data were extracted. Forest plots and summarized relative risks (RR) including 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for various complication types. Results: Of the 9354 identified studies, 107 studies were included in the meta-analyses and based on these, 157 data sets were extracted. Preoperative smoking was associated with an increased risk of various postoperative complications including general morbidity (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.33–1.74), wound complications (RR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.87–2.49), general infections (RR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.32–1.79), pulmonary complications (RR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.35–2.23), neurological complications (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.01–1.88), and admission to intensive care unit (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.14–2.25). Preoperative smoking status was not observed to be associated with postoperative mortality, cardiovascular complications, bleedings, anastomotic leakage, or allograft rejection. Conclusions: Preoperative smoking was found to be associated with an increased risk of the following postoperative complications: general morbidity, wound complications, general infections, pulmonary complications, neurological complications, and admission to the intensive care unit. In this meta-analysis, we systematically summarized the current evidence of the association between preoperative smoking and postoperative complications elaborated on complication type. We found an increased risk of several postoperative complications among patients smoking preoperatively, which implies that a special focus should be to reduce preoperative smoking among surgical patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Tobacco smoking and cancer: A meta‐analysis
Gandini, S., Botteri, E., Iodice, S., Boniol, M., Lowenfels, A. B., Maisonneuve, P., & Boyle, P. (2008) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.23033 · Cited by 971
Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged >or=18 years --- United States, 2009.
Peachacek, T. F., Kaufmann, R. B., Caraballo, R. S., James, C., Regan, A. K., & Dube, S. R. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 814
Field, A. P. (2001) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.6.2.161 · Cited by 725
Hamling, J., Lee, P., Weitkunat, R., & Ambühl, M. (2008) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3013 · Cited by 651
Sørensen, L. T. (2012) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.5 · Cited by 645
Smoking cessation reduces postoperative complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Mills, E., Eyawo, O., Lockhart, I., Kelly, S., Wu, P., & Ebbert, J. O. (2011) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.09.013 · Cited by 599
Risk Factors for Infection After Spinal Surgery
Fang, A., Hu, S. S., Endres, N., & Bradford, D. S. (2005) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000166532.58227.4f · Cited by 572
The Human Costs of Tobacco Use
Bartecchi, C. E., MacKenzie, T. D., & Schrier, R. W. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199403313301307 · Cited by 534
Cigarette Smoking Decreases Tissue Oxygen
Jensen, J. A. (1991) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410330093013 · Cited by 516
Cited by
Vogel, J. D., Felder, S. I., Bhama, A. R., Hawkins, A. T., Langenfeld, S. J., Shaffer, V. O., Thorsen, A. J., Weiser, M. R., Chang, G. J., Lightner, A. L., et al. (2022) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000002323 · Cited by 401
Joliat, G., Kobayashi, K., Hasegawa, K., Thomson, J., Padbury, R., Scott, M., Brustia, R., Scatton, O., Tran Cao, H. S., Vauthey, J., et al. (2023) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-022-06732-5 · Cited by 330
Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort
Eller, A., Bardsley, T., Greene, T., Varner, M., Silver, R., & Bowman, Z. (2013) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1361833 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Grønkjær, M., Eliasen, M., Skov-Ettrup, L. S., Tolstrup, J. S., Christiansen, A. H., Mikkelsen, S. S., Becker, U., & Flensborg-Madsen, T.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 259
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-71
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2335761876
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Smoking Status and Postoperative Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182911913
- The paper
- Grønkjær, M., Eliasen, M., Skov-Ettrup, L. S., Tolstrup, J. S., Christiansen, A. H., Mikkelsen, S. S., Becker, U., & Flensborg-Madsen, T. (2014). Preoperative Smoking Status and Postoperative Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182911913
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.