The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases after Chemotherapy: Impact of Chemotherapy-Related Liver Injuries, Pathological Tumor Response, and Micrometastases on Long-term Survival
Abstract
In Brief Objectives: We analyzed the impact of chemotherapy-related liver injuries (CALI), pathological tumor regression grade (TRG), and micrometastases on long-term prognosis in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal metastases after preoperative chemotherapy. Background: CALI worsen the short-term outcomes of liver resection, but their impact on long-term prognosis is unknown. Recently, a prognostic role of TRG has been suggested. Micrometastases (microscopic vascular or biliary invasion) are reduced by preoperative chemotherapy, but their impact on survival is unclear. Methods: Patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal metastases between 1998 and 2011 and treated with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan-based preoperative chemotherapy were eligible for the study. Patients with operative mortality or incomplete resection (R2) were excluded. All specimens were reviewed to assess CALI, TRG, and micrometastases. Results: A total of 323 patients were included. Grade 2–3 sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) was present in 124 patients (38.4%), grade 2–3 steatosis in 73 (22.6%), and steatohepatitis in 30 (9.3%). Among all patients, 22.9% had TRG 1–2 (major response), whereas 55.7% had TRG 4–5 (no response). Microvascular invasion was detected in 37.8% of patients and microscopic biliary infiltration in 5.6%. The higher the SOS grade the lower the pathological response: TRG 1–2 occurred in 16.9% of patients with grade 2–3 SOS versus 26.6% of patients with grade 0–1 SOS (P = 0.032). After a median follow-up of 36.9 months, 5-year survival was 38.6%. CALI did not negatively impact survival. Multivariate analysis showed that grade 2–3 steatosis was associated with better survival than grade 0–1 steatosis (5-year survival rate of 52.5% vs 35.2%, P = 0.002). TRG better than the percentage of viable cells stratified patient prognosis: 5-year survival rate of 60.4% in TRG 1–2, 40.2% in TRG 3, and 29.8% in TRG 4–5 (P = 0.0001). Microscopic vascular and biliary invasion negatively impacted outcome (5-year survival rate of 23.3% vs 45.7% if absent, P = 0.017; 0% vs 42.3%, P = 0.032, respectively). Conclusions: TRG was confirmed to be a crucial prognostic determinant. CALI do not negatively impact long-term prognosis, but the tumor response is reduced in patients with grade 2–3 SOS. Steatosis was found to have a protective effect on survival. Micrometastases significantly impacted prognosis assessment. This study clarified the contribution of pathological data to prognostic assessment of patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal metastases after chemotherapy. The pathological response to chemotherapy was confirmed as one of the strongest prognostic determinants. Chemotherapy-related liver injuries did not negatively impact long-term prognosis, even if the tumor response was reduced in patients with grade 2–3 sinusoidal dilatation. Steatosis was found to have a protective effect on survival. Identification of microvascular and biliary invasion significantly impacted prognosis assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease†
Kleiner, D. E., Brunt, E. M., Van Natta, M., Behling, C., Contos, M. J., Cummings, O. W., Ferrell, L. D., Liu, Y., Torbenson, M. S., Unalp‐Arida, A., et al. (2005) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20701 · Cited by 10,791
Cited by
Adam, R., de Gramont, A., Figueras, J., Kokudo, N., Kunstlinger, F., Loyer, E., Poston, G., Rougier, P., Rubbia-Brandt, L., Sobrero, A., et al. (2015) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.06.006 · Cited by 607
Self-citationViganò, L., Procopio, F., Cimino, M. M., Donadon, M., Gatti, A., Costa, G., Del Fabbro, D., & Torzilli, G. (2016) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-015-5009-y · Cited by 266
Self-citationStevenson, H. L., Prats, M. M., & Sasatomi, E. (2017) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2998-2 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Viganò, L., Capussotti, L., De Rosa, G., De Saussure, W. O., Mentha, G., & Rubbia-Brandt, L.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 258
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 731-742
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034929997
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases after Chemotherapy: Impact of Chemotherapy-Related Liver Injuries, Pathological Tumor Response, and Micrometastases on Long-term Survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a6183e
- The paper
- Viganò, L., Capussotti, L., De Rosa, G., De Saussure, W. O., Mentha, G., & Rubbia-Brandt, L. (2013). Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases after Chemotherapy: Impact of Chemotherapy-Related Liver Injuries, Pathological Tumor Response, and Micrometastases on Long-term Survival. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a6183e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.