The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Disorders Bias Maternal Recall of Obstetrical Events Up to 10 Years After Delivery?
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Objectives The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether symptoms of incontinence and prolapse bias maternal recall of obstetrical events up to 10 years after delivery. Methods In this secondary analysis of data gathered from the Mothers’ Outcomes After Delivery study, we compared obstetrical medical records with maternal recall of delivery events. We calculated the agreement between maternal recall and the medical record across 1821 deliveries from 1011 participants for events including macrosomia, mode of delivery, prolonged second of labor, episiotomy, spontaneous laceration, anal sphincter laceration, and operative delivery. Women with symptomatic pelvic floor disorders were identified through administration of the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire or a clinical history of therapy for a pelvic floor disorder. We determined whether agreement between maternal recall and the medical record differed for those with or without symptoms using the medical record as a criterion standard. Results Agreement between maternal recall and the medical record was excellent for macrosomia and forceps deliveries (κ > 0.8), fair to good for episiotomy (κ = 0.61) and anal sphincter laceration (κ = 0.57), and poor for spontaneous perineal laceration (κ = 0.41). Symptomatic pelvic floor disorders did not impact maternal recall of macrosomia, prolonged second stage, episiotomy, spontaneous laceration, or operative delivery. However, recall of anal sphincter lacerations was biased by symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. Specifically, symptomatic women were significantly more likely to report a history of anal sphincter laceration, regardless of whether a sphincter laceration was documented (P = 0.025). Conclusions Maternal recall of anal sphincter laceration may be biased by symptomatic pelvic floor disorders. In research based on maternal recall of obstetrical events, this could strengthen the apparent association between sphincter laceration and pelvic floor disorders. This study investigated long term maternal recall of obstetrical events. Women had difficulty recalling some details of childbirth, such as whether the cervix was dilated prior to cesarean. Agreement between maternal recall and the obstetrical record was poor for some details, most notably perineal laceration. In addition, women with symptomatic pelvic floor disorders were more likely to report a history of anal sphincter laceration, regardless of whether a sphincter laceration had occurred.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Epidemiologic studies suggest that pelvic floor disorders are associated with childbirth, because these conditions are strongly associated with parity 5 and are more common after vaginal birth vs cesarean birth.6”
From Association of Delivery Mode With Pelvic Floor Disorders After Childbirth. (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Epidemiologic studies suggest that pelvic floor disorders are associated with childbirth, because these conditions are strongly associated with parity 5 and are more common after vaginal birth vs cesarean birth.6”
From Association of Delivery Mode With Pelvic Floor Disorders After Childbirth. (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Participation did not differ by delivery mode.6”
From Association of Delivery Mode With Pelvic Floor Disorders After Childbirth. (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
On the Interpretation of χ 2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P
Fisher, R. A. (1922) · Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society · doi:10.2307/2340521 · Cited by 2,975
Answering Autobiographical Questions: The Impact of Memory and Inference on Surveys
Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J., & Shevell, S. K. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563494 · Cited by 1,183
Reproducibility and Validity of Maternal Recall of Pregnancy-Related Events
Ryan, C. T., Rich-Edwards, J. W., Michels, K. B., Berkey, C. S., Hunter, D. J., Frazier, A. L., Willett, W. C., & Buka, S. L. (1999) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199911000-00022 · Cited by 459
Pelvic floor disorders 5-10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth
Handa, V. L., Blomquist, J. L., Knoepp, L. R., Hoskey, K. A., McDermott, K. C., & Muñoz, A. (2011) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3182267f2f · Cited by 345
Self-citationA COMPARISON OF PREGNANCY HISTORY RECALL AND MEDICAL RECORDS
Tilley, B. C., BARNES, A. B., Bergstralh, E. J., et al. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113997 · Cited by 189
Rice, F. J., Lewis, A., Harold, G. T., van den Bree, M. B. M., Boivin, J., Hay, D. F., Owen, M. J., & Thapar, A. (2006) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.09.015 · Cited by 177
Epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence questionnaire: validation of a new epidemiologic survey.
Lukacz, E. S., Lawrence, J. M., Buckwalter, J. G., Burchette, R. J., Nager, C. W., & Luber, K. M. (2005) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-005-1314-5 · Cited by 131
Githens, P. B., Glass, C. A., Sloan, F. A., & Entman, S. S. (1993) · Birth · doi:10.1111/j.1523-536x.1993.tb00438.x · Cited by 127
CHILDBIRTH RESEARCH DATA: MEDICAL RECORDS OR WOMEN'S REPORTS?1
Hewson, D., & Bennett, A. (1987) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114554 · Cited by 106
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hewson, 1987, Childbirth research data: medical records or womens reports Am J E, pidemiol, 125, 484
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Association of Delivery Mode With Pelvic Floor Disorders After Childbirth.
Blomquist, J. L., Muñoz, A., Carroll, M., & Handa, V. L. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.18315 · Cited by 328
Self-citationLongitudinal study of quantitative changes in pelvic organ support among parous women.
Handa, V. L., Blomquist, J. L., Roem, J., & Muňoz, A. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.214 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C., Smith, L. J., Pierce, C. B., Blomquist, J. L., & Handa, V. L.
- Affiliations
- Greater Baltimore Medical Center (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Crystal
- Handa, Victoria L.
- Venue
- Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 129-134
- ISSN
- 2151-8378 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4733317
- OpenAlex
- W2080400977
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Urogynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD056275)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Keywords
- pelvic floor dysfunction, urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, perineal tears, episiotomy, mode of delivery, recall bias, episiotomy repair, episiotomy complications
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Obstetric Labor Complications, Maternal Age, Medical Records, Mothers, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Mental Recall, Time Factors, Observer Variation, Delivery, Obstetric, Pelvic Floor Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review