The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Operating on the Oldest-Old: Vaginal Prolapse Surgery Outcomes in Women Over 90
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Women aged 90 years and older ("oldest-old") represent a small but growing population who may experience bothersome pelvic organ prolapse and opt for surgical repair. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare perioperative adverse events (AEs) within 8 weeks of prolapse surgery between women ≥90 years and younger patients. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of a dual-center retrospective cohort study of women ≥61 years old undergoing major prolapse surgery from January 2016 to May 2023. We identified all women ≥90 years and matched them to women <90 years in a 1:4 fashion based on Charlson Comorbidity Index score and surgery type. Matching was performed without replacement. The primary outcome was a composite AE outcome, defined as all intraoperative and postoperative complications within 8 weeks of surgery. RESULTS: There were 24 oldest-old undergoing prolapse surgery who were matched to 96 women with mean ± standard deviation age of 77.2 ± 5.7 years. Women ≥90 years were more likely to have a lower body mass index ( P < 0.01), greater preoperative prolapse stage ( P = 0.049), and were less likely to have general anesthesia ( P < 0.01). Patients did not differ in medical comorbidities, frailty status, concomitant hysterectomy or incontinence procedure, or length of postoperative stay. The oldest-old did not experience any intraoperative complications and had low rates of readmission (8.3%) and discharge to skilled nursing facilities (4.2%). Age ≥90 was not associated with composite AEs on multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio 1.60, 95% confidence interval [0.39-6.55]). CONCLUSIONS: Age ≥90 years does not appear to increase the risk of perioperative AEs in women with similar comorbidities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies addressing perioperative outcomes and frailty, including in gynecologic surgery, are retrospective in nature or database driven.
“Many studies--including those looking at gynecologic surgery--addressing perioperative outcomes and frailty are retrospective in nature or database driven leaving opportunity for further understanding the impact of frailty on gynecologic surgery outcomes in prospective surgical trials.7–16”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 2020, Surgery for the very old: are nonagenarians different?, Am Surg, 86, 56, 10.1177/000313482008600129 · DOI
- 2017, Are they too old for surgery? Safety of cholecystectomy in superelderly patients (≥ age 90), Perm J, 21, 16
- 2022, Outcomes of surgery in patients 90 years of age and older: a retrospective cohort study, Surgery, 171, 1365, 10.1016/j.surg.2021.09.030 · DOI
- 2014, Age alone should not preclude surgery: contemporary outcomes after aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 148, 1360, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.01.015 · DOI
- 2019, Outcome of spinal surgery in patients older than age 90 years, World Neurosurg, 123, e457, 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.188 · DOI
- 1987, A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation, J Chronic Dis, 40, 373, 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, New 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index using American College of Surgeons NSQIP data, J Am Coll Surg, 226, 173, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.005 · DOI
- 2018, Characterizing functional health status of surgical patients in clinical notes, AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc, 2017, 379
- 2014, Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women, Obstet Gynecol, 123, 141, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057 · DOI
- 2015, Trends in management of pelvic organ prolapse among female Medicare beneficiaries, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 212, 463.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.025 · DOI
- 2020, Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and quality of life-a nationwide cohort study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 222, 588.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1285 · DOI
- 2020, Are advances in survival among the oldest old seen across the spectrum of health and functioning?, J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 75, 2354, 10.1093/gerona/glaa009 · DOI
- 2021, Outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery in nonagenarian patients: a multicenter retrospective study, Gastrointest Oncol, 12, 1568, 10.21037/jgo-21-324 · DOI
- 2017, Five-year survival after surgery in nonagenarian patients, Geriatr Gerontol Int, 17, 2389, 10.1111/ggi.13081 · DOI
- 2020, Perioperative safety of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in elderly and frail patients, Obstet Gynecol, 135, 599, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003682 · DOI
- 2016, Perioperative adverse events associated with colpocleisis for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 214, 501.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.921 · DOI
- 2017, Perioperative complications following colpocleisis with and without concomitant vaginal hysterectomy, Int Urogynecol J, 28, 1671, 10.1007/s00192-017-3340-5 · DOI
- 2006, Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients, J Am Coll Surg, 203, 865, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.026 · DOI
- 2013, Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons, J Am Coll Surg, 217, 833, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385 · DOI
- 1993, Is age a risk factor for surgery?, Med Clin North Am, 77, 327, 10.1016/S0025-7125(16)30254-1 · DOI
- 2019, What matters? The valued life activities of older adults undergoing elective surgery, J Am Geriatr Soc, 67, 2305, 10.1111/jgs.16102 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Erekson, E., Menefee, S. A., Whitworth, R., Gizlice, S., Zyczynski, H. M., Rahn, D. D., Amundsen, C. L., Sung, V. W., Arya, L. A., Ferrando, C. A., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.11.002
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zuo, S. W., Warner, K., Zyczynski, H., & Ackenbom, M. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
- John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zuo, Stephanie W.
- Venue
- Urogynecology
- Published
- 2025-01-17
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 315-321
- ISSN
- 2151-8378 (ISSN-L)
- 2771-1897
- PMC
- PMC13282727
- OpenAlex
- W4406343195
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Urogynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (K23AG073517)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Keywords
- oldest old, vaginal prolapse surgery, pelvic organ prolapse, perioperative complications, postoperative complications, older women, general anesthesia, frailty, comorbidities, hospital readmission, skilled nursing facility discharge
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Uterine Prolapse, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review