Identifying participants for inclusion in hospital-based violence intervention: An analysis of 18 years of urban firearm recidivism
Abstract
Background Identifying individuals at highest risk maximizes efficacy of prevention programs in decreasing recidivist gunshot wound (GSW) injury. Characteristics of GSW recidivists may identify this population. Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs) are one effective strategy; however, programs are expensive, therefore, when possible, epidemiologic data should guide inclusion criteria. Methods Seventeen years of all GSW patients presenting to an urban Level I trauma center were reviewed. Countywide murders were reviewed from the same timeframe. Recidivists were any patient presenting twice, either to the hospital or once to the hospital and subsequently dying by firearm. Demographics and characteristics of future recidivists were compared with nonfuture recidivists. Results There were 9,699 unique intentional, GSW cases reviewed and 1,426 died, leaving 8,273 at risk of recidivism. Five hundred fourteen (6.2%) became recidivists. Most recidivists were African-American men and were younger at first GSW. Median time between incidents was 2.5 years, with a range of 0 days to 16 years. Nearly half were treated and released from the emergency department at their first episode of GSW. For recidivists who died, 128 died at the second incident, 29 at later incidents. Mortality from a second incident of firearm injury is 10% higher than first injuries, second hospitalizations are US $5,000 more expensive, and loss of life has a societal cost of US $167 billion in this co…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among the four studies that conducted a survival analysis, cumulative incidence for recurrent firearm injuries ranged from approximately 2% after five years to 16% after 10 years.
“Among the four studies that conducted a survival analysis, cumulative incidence for recurrent firearm injuries ranged from approximately 2% after five years to 16% after 10 years.18,35,42,44”
From Incidence of and Factors Associated With Recurrent Firearm Injury Among Patients Presenting to St. Louis Trauma Centers, 2010 to 2019 (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mueller, K. L., Cooper, B. P., Moran, V., Lew, D., Ancona, R., Landman, J. M., Spruce, M., Marotta, P., Liss, D. B., Mancini, M. A., et al. (2023) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m23-0069 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bonne, S., Tufariello, A., Coles, Z., Hohl, B., Ostermann, M., Boxer, P., Sloan-Power, E., Gusmano, M., Glass, N. E., Kunac, A., & Livingston, D.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
- Published
- 2020-03-17
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-73
- ISSN
- 2163-0755 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-0763
- OpenAlex
- W3011228014
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Keywords
- hospital-based violence intervention programs, gunshot wounds, urban violence, high-risk population identification, African American men, young men, trauma center patients, homicide, violence prevention
- MeSH terms
- Recidivism, Gun Violence, Adult, Female, Firearms, Hospitals, University, Humans, Male, New Jersey, Patient Readmission, Trauma Centers, Wounds, Gunshot, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review