Recidivism rates following firearm injury as determined by a collaborative hospital and law enforcement database
Abstract
Background Recidivism is a key outcome measure for injury prevention programs. Firearm injury recidivism rates are difficult to determine because of poor longitudinal follow-up and incomplete, disparate databases. Reported recidivism rates from trauma registries are 2% to 3%. We created a collaborative database merging law enforcement, emergency department, and inpatient trauma registry data to more accurately determine rates of recidivism in patients presenting to our trauma center following firearm injury. Methods A collaborative database for Jefferson County, Kentucky, was constructed to include violent firearm injuries encountered by the trauma center or law enforcement from 2008 to 2019. Iterative deterministic data linkage was used to create the database and eliminate redundancies. From patients with at least one hospital encounter, raw recidivism rates were calculated by dividing the number of patients injured at least twice by the total number of patients. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate risk factors for recidivism. The cumulative incidence of recidivism over time was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier survival model. Results There were 2, 363 assault-type firearm injuries with at least 1 hospital encounter, approximately 9% of which did not survive their initial encounter. The collaborative database demonstrated raw recidivism rates for assault-type firearm injuries of 9.5% compared with 2.5% from the trauma registry alone. Risk factors were young ag…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among the four studies that conducted a survival analysis, cumulative incidence for recurrent firearm injuries ranged from approximately 2% after five years to 16% after 10 years.
“Among the four studies that conducted a survival analysis, cumulative incidence for recurrent firearm injuries ranged from approximately 2% after five years to 16% after 10 years.18,35,42,44”
From Incidence of and Factors Associated With Recurrent Firearm Injury Among Patients Presenting to St. Louis Trauma Centers, 2010 to 2019 (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
Firearm injuries in the United States
Fowler, K. A., Dahlberg, L. L., Haileyesus, T., & Annest, J. L. (2015) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.06.002 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mueller, K. L., Cooper, B. P., Moran, V., Lew, D., Ancona, R., Landman, J. M., Spruce, M., Marotta, P., Liss, D. B., Mancini, M. A., et al. (2023) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m23-0069 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Among the 4 studies that conducted a survival analysis, cumulative incidence for recurrent firearm injuries ranged from approximately 2% after 5 years to 16% after 10 years (17, 18, 41, 43).”
BackgroundSequelae and care after firearm injury.
Strong, B. L., Lauerman, M. H., & Scalea, T. M. (2025) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.10498 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marshall, W. A., Egger, M. E., Pike, A., Bozeman, M. C., Franklin, G. A., Nash, N. A., Smith, J. W., Richardson, J. D., Harbrecht, B. G., Benns, M. V., & Miller, K. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 371-376
- ISSN
- 2163-0755 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-0763
- OpenAlex
- W3017500980
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
- Keywords
- firearm injuries, recidivism, injury recurrence, violent assault, trauma registry, data linkage, injury prevention, risk factors, cumulative incidence, trauma center outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Black or African American, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Kentucky, Male, Recurrence, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Wounds, Gunshot, Incidence, Databases, Factual, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Law Enforcement, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review