Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Management of the Open Abdomen in Trauma and Emergency General Surgery: Part 1—Damage Control

Diaz, Jose J., Cullinane, Daniel C., Dutton, William D., Jerome, Rebecca, Bagdonas, Richard, Bilaniuk, Jarolslaw O., Collier, Bryan R., Como, John J., Cumming, John, Griffen, Maggie, Gunter, Oliver L., Kirby, John, Lottenburg, Larry, Mowery, Nathan, Riordan, William P., Martin, Niels, Platz, Jon, Stassen, Nicole, Winston, Eleanor S.·2010·Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The open abdomen technique, after both military and civilian trauma, emergency general or vascular surgery, has been used in some form for the past 30 years. There have been several hundred citations on the indications and the management of the open abdomen. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management committee convened a study group to organize the world's literature for the management of the open abdomen. This effort was divided into two parts: damage control and the management of the open abdomen. Only damage control is presented in this study. Part 1 is divided into indications for the open abdomen, temporary abdominal closure, staged abdominal repair, and nutrition support of the open abdomen. METHODS: A literature review was performed for more than 30 years. Prospective and retrospective studies were included. The reviews and case reports were excluded. Of 1,200 articles, 95 were selected. Seventeen surgeons reviewed the articles with four defined criteria. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma primer was used to grade the evidence. RESULTS: There was only one level I recommendation. A patient with documented abdominal compartment syndrome should undergo decompressive laparotomy. CONCLUSION: The open abdomen technique remains a heroic maneuver in the care of the critically ill trauma or surgical patient. For the best outcomes, a protocol for the indications, temporary abdominal closure, staged abdominal reconstruction, and nutrition support should be in place.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ta.0b013e3181da0da5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Diaz, J. J., Cullinane, D. C., Dutton, W. D., Jerome, R., Bagdonas, R., Bilaniuk, J. O., Collier, B. R., Como, J. J., Cumming, J., Griffen, M., Gunter, O. L., Kirby, J., Lottenburg, L., Mowery, N., Riordan, W. P., Martin, N., Platz, J., Stassen, N., & Winston, E. S.
Venue
Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
Published
2010-06
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
1425-1438
ISSN
0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976546852
Cited by
196
References
1
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Management of the Open Abdomen in Trauma and Emergency General Surgery: Part 1—Damage Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ta.0b013e3181da0da5
The paper
Diaz, J. J., Cullinane, D. C., Dutton, W. D., Jerome, R., Bagdonas, R., Bilaniuk, J. O., Collier, B. R., Como, J. J., Cumming, J., Griffen, M., Gunter, O. L., Kirby, J., Lottenburg, L., Mowery, N., Riordan, W. P., Martin, N., Platz, J., Stassen, N., & Winston, E. S. (2010). The Management of the Open Abdomen in Trauma and Emergency General Surgery: Part 1—Damage Control. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e3181da0da5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.