The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group
Open accessAbstract
With the development of modern solid-phase assays to detect anti-HLA antibodies and a more precise histological classification, the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has become more common and is a major cause of kidney graft loss. Currently, there are no approved therapies and treatment guidelines are based on low-level evidence. The number of prospective randomized trials for the treatment of AMR is small, and the lack of an accepted common standard for care has been an impediment to the development of new therapies. To help alleviate this, The Transplantation Society convened a meeting of international experts to develop a consensus as to what is appropriate treatment for active and chronic active AMR. The aim was to reach a consensus for standard of care treatment against which new therapies could be evaluated. At the meeting, the underlying biology of AMR, the criteria for diagnosis, the clinical phenotypes, and outcomes were discussed. The evidence for different treatments was reviewed, and a consensus for what is acceptable standard of care for the treatment of active and chronic active AMR was presented. While it was agreed that the aims of treatment are to preserve renal function, reduce histological injury, and reduce the titer of donor-specific antibody, there was no conclusive evidence to support any specific therapy. As a result, the treatment recommendations are largely based on expert opinion. It is acknowledged that properly conducted and powered clinical trials of biologically plausible agents are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IgG endopeptidase in highly sensitized patients undergoing transplantation
Jordan, S. C., Lorant, T., Choi, J., Kjellman, C., Winstedt, L., Bengtsson, M., Zhang, X., Eich, T., Toyoda, M., Eriksson, B.-M., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1612567 · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Cited by
Connelly‐Smith, L., Alquist, C. R., Aqui, N. A., Hofmann, J. C., Klingel, R., Onwuemene, O. A., Patriquin, C. J., Pham, H. P., Sanchez, A. P., Schneiderman, J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.22043 · Cited by 684
Long-Term Survival after Kidney Transplantation
Hariharan, S., Israni, A. K., & Danovitch, G. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra2014530 · Cited by 664
Allorecognition and the spectrum of kidney transplant rejection
Callemeyn, J., Lamarthée, B., Koenig, A., Koshy, P., Thaunat, O., & Naesens, M. (2022) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2021.11.029 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Schinstock, C. A., Mannon, R. B., Budde, K., Chong, A. S., Haas, M., Knechtle, S., Lefaucheur, C., Montgomery, R. A., Nickerson, P., Tullius, S. G., Ahn, C., Askar, M., Crespo, M., Chadban, S. J., Feng, S., Jordan, S. C., Man, K., Mengel, M., Morris, R. E., O’Doherty, I., Ozdemir, B. H., Seron, D., Tambur, A. R., Tanabe, K., Taupin, J.-L., & O’Connell, P. J.
- Venue
- Transplantation
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 911-922
- ISSN
- 0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2998211851
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/tp.0000000000003095
- The paper
- Schinstock, C. A., Mannon, R. B., Budde, K., Chong, A. S., Haas, M., Knechtle, S., Lefaucheur, C., Montgomery, R. A., Nickerson, P., Tullius, S. G., Ahn, C., Askar, M., Crespo, M., Chadban, S. J., Feng, S., Jordan, S. C., Man, K., Mengel, M., Morris, R. E., . . . O’Connell, P. J. (2020). Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000003095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.