Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group

Open access
Schinstock, Carrie A., Mannon, Roslyn B., Budde, Klemens, Chong, Anita S., Haas, Mark, Knechtle, Stuart, Lefaucheur, Carmen, Montgomery, Robert A., Nickerson, Peter, Tullius, Stefan G., Ahn, Curie, Askar, Medhat, Crespo, Marta, Chadban, Steven J., Feng, Sandy, Jordan, Stanley C., Man, Kwan, Mengel, Michael, Morris, Randall E., O’Doherty, Inish, Ozdemir, Binnaz H., Seron, Daniel, Tambur, Anat R., Tanabe, Kazunari, Taupin, Jean-Luc, O’Connell, Philip J.·2020·Transplantation

Abstract

With the development of modern solid-phase assays to detect anti-HLA antibodies and a more precise histological classification, the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has become more common and is a major cause of kidney graft loss. Currently, there are no approved therapies and treatment guidelines are based on low-level evidence. The number of prospective randomized trials for the treatment of AMR is small, and the lack of an accepted common standard for care has been an impediment to the development of new therapies. To help alleviate this, The Transplantation Society convened a meeting of international experts to develop a consensus as to what is appropriate treatment for active and chronic active AMR. The aim was to reach a consensus for standard of care treatment against which new therapies could be evaluated. At the meeting, the underlying biology of AMR, the criteria for diagnosis, the clinical phenotypes, and outcomes were discussed. The evidence for different treatments was reviewed, and a consensus for what is acceptable standard of care for the treatment of active and chronic active AMR was presented. While it was agreed that the aims of treatment are to preserve renal function, reduce histological injury, and reduce the titer of donor-specific antibody, there was no conclusive evidence to support any specific therapy. As a result, the treatment recommendations are largely based on expert opinion. It is acknowledged that properly conducted and powered clinical trials of biologically plausible agents are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/tp.0000000000003095

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Schinstock, C. A., Mannon, R. B., Budde, K., Chong, A. S., Haas, M., Knechtle, S., Lefaucheur, C., Montgomery, R. A., Nickerson, P., Tullius, S. G., Ahn, C., Askar, M., Crespo, M., Chadban, S. J., Feng, S., Jordan, S. C., Man, K., Mengel, M., Morris, R. E., O’Doherty, I., Ozdemir, B. H., Seron, D., Tambur, A. R., Tanabe, K., Taupin, J.-L., & O’Connell, P. J.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
2020-05
Volume
104
Issue
5
Pages
911-922
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998211851
Cited by
345
References
1
FWCI
25.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/tp.0000000000003095
The paper
Schinstock, C. A., Mannon, R. B., Budde, K., Chong, A. S., Haas, M., Knechtle, S., Lefaucheur, C., Montgomery, R. A., Nickerson, P., Tullius, S. G., Ahn, C., Askar, M., Crespo, M., Chadban, S. J., Feng, S., Jordan, S. C., Man, K., Mengel, M., Morris, R. E., . . . O’Connell, P. J. (2020). Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000003095

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.