The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adherence to the Medical Regimen During the First Two Years After Lung Transplantation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of adherence to the medical regimen for maximizing health after lung transplantation, no prospective studies report on rates or risk factors for nonadherence in this patient population. Whether adherence levels differ in lung versus other types of transplant recipients is unknown. METHODS: A total of 178 lung recipients and a comparison group of 126 heart recipients were enrolled. Adherence in nine areas was assessed in separate patient and family caregiver interviews 2, 7, 12, 18, and 24 months posttransplant. Potential risk factors for nonadherence were obtained at the initial assessment. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence rates of persistent nonadherence (i.e., nonadherence at > or =2 consecutive assessments) were significantly lower (P<0.05) in lung recipients than heart recipients for taking immunosuppressants (13% nonadherent vs. 21%, respectively), diet (34% vs. 56%), and smoking (1% vs. 8%). Lung recipients had significantly higher persistent nonadherence to completing blood work (28% vs. 17%) and monitoring blood pressure (70% vs. 59%). They had a high rate of spirometry nonadherence (62%; not measured in heart recipients). The groups did not differ in nonadherence to attending clinic appointments (27%), exercise (44%), or alcohol limitations (7%). In both groups, poor caregiver support and having only public insurance (e.g., Medicaid) increased nonadherence risk in all areas. CONCLUSIONS: Lung recipients were neither uniformly better nor worse than heart recipients in adhering to their regimen. Lung recipients have particular difficulty with some home monitoring activities. Strategies to maximize adherence in both groups should build on caregiver support and on strengthening financial resources for patient healthcare requirements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other groups[41–43] suggested that in addition to medication adherence, other dimensions, such as health perception, diet, exercise, and keeping appointments and contact with the transplant center might influence outcome.”
From Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Using Multivariate Statistics (5th Edition)
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2006) · Allyn & Bacon, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 11,188
Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra050100 · Cited by 7,974
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136319 · Cited by 7,791 · cited 2×
“The supportiveness (both emotionally and practically) of the recipient’s relationship with their primary family caregiver was assessed with a measure adapted from Spanier (38) and Pearlin and Schooler (39) and used in other studies (40, 41) (alpha 0.”
MethodInfluentialMeasuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads
Spanier, G. B. (1976) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/350547 · Cited by 7,095
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173489 · Cited by 2,220
DiMatteo, M. R. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9 · Cited by 2,169
Haynes, R. B., Taylor, D. W., & Sackett, D. L. (1979) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,627
Credibility of analogue therapy rationales
Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(72)90045-6 · Cited by 1,553 · cited 1×
“These latter items were adapted from an instrument measuring opinions about medical treatment (34).”
MethodEvaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents.
(1950) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1950.00230180176018 · Cited by 1,134
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2002, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines., Federal Register, 67, 6931
- Cox, 1984, Analysis of survival data, 2nd edition.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leard, L. E., Holm, A. M., Valapour, M., Glanville, A. R., Attawar, S., Aversa, M., Campos, S. V., Christon, L. M., Cypel, M., Dellgren, G., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2021.07.005 · Cited by 821
Dew, M. A., DiMartini, A. F., Dobbels, F., Grady, K. L., Jowsey‐Gregoire, S. G., Kaan, A., Kendall, K., Young, Q., Abbey, S. E., Butt, Z. A., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2018.03.005 · Cited by 192
Self-citationOptimizing Medication Adherence
Prendergast, M. B., & Gaston, R. S. (2010) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.07241009 · Cited by 145
De Geest, S., Burkhalter, H., Bogert, L., Berben, L., Glass, T. R., Denhaerynck, K., & the Psychosocial Interest Group and Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (2014) · Transplant International · doi:10.1111/tri.12312 · Cited by 132
Comprehensive Care of the Lung Transplant Patient
Adegunsoye, A., Strek, M. E., Garrity, E. R., Guzy, R. D., & Bag, R. (2016) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.001 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Dew, M. A., DiMartini, A. F., De Vito Dabbs, A., Zomak, R., De Geest, S., Dobbels, F., Myaskovsky, L., Switzer, G. E., Unruh, M., Steel, J. L., Kormos, R. L., & McCurry, K. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Dew, Mary Amanda
- ORCID
- Venue
- Transplantation
- Published
- 2008-01-27
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-202
- ISSN
- 0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3387784
- OpenAlex
- W2047045261
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH059229, MH072718, R01MH059229, R01MH072718)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- medication adherence, lung transplantation, heart transplantation, dietary adherence, smoking cessation, spirometry, caregiver support, Medicaid, risk factors for non-adherence, post-transplant care
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Emotions, Ethnicity, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Income, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Patient Compliance, Social Support, Heart Transplantation, Lung Transplantation, Treatment Refusal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review