Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 16Urinary Tract Infections ManagementMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Cost Savings Analysis of Topical Estrogen Therapy in Urinary Tract Infection Prevention Among Postmenopausal Women

Abstract

Introduction UTIs are some of the most common infections in geriatric patients, with many women experiencing recurrent infections after menopause. In the US, annual UTI-related costs are $2 billion, with recurrent infections creating a significant economic burden. Given the data published on topical estrogen in reducing the number of infections for postmenopausal women with recurrent UTI, we sought to evaluate how this would translate to cost savings. Methods We performed a systematic literature review of UTI reduction secondary to topical estrogen utilization in postmenopausal female patients. The cost per UTI was determined based on published Medicare spending on UTI per beneficiary, weighted on reported likelihood of complicated and resistant infections. For a patient with recurrent infections, topical estrogen therapy reported on average can reduce infections from 5 to 0.5 to 2 times per person per year. Results At a calculated cost per UTI of $1222, the reduction in UTI spending can range between $3670 and $5499 per beneficiary per year. Per-beneficiary spending on topical estrogen therapies was $1013 on average ($578-$1445) in 2020. After including the cost of the therapy, overall cost savings for topical estrogen therapies were $1226 to $4888 annually per patient. Conclusions Topical estrogens are a cost-conscious way to improve the burden of UTI on postmenopausal women with the potential for billions of dollars in Medicare savings. System-wide efforts should be made t…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/upj.0000000000000513

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
Houston, C. G., Azar, W. S., Huang, S. S., Rubin, R., Dorris, C. S., & Sussman, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Urology Practice
Published
2024-03
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
257-266
ISSN
2352-0779 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390328302
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urology Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
topical estrogen, urinary tract infection, recurrent urinary tract infection, postmenopausal women, cost reduction, Medicare spending, infection control, menopause, economic burden
MeSH terms
Administration, Topical, Aged, Estrogens, Female, Humans, United States, Urinary Tract Infections, Cost Savings, Postmenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.