Cited by 66Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expanded Demographic Norms for Version 3 of the Alzheimer Disease Centers’ Neuropsychological Test Battery in the Uniform Data Set

Open access
Sachs, Bonnie C., Steenland, Kyle, Zhao, Liping, Hughes, Timothy M., Weintraub, Sandra, Dodge, Hiroko H., Barnes, Lisa L., Craft, Suzanne, Parker, Monica L., Goldstein, Felicia C.·2020·Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders

Abstract

Background: Norms for the Uniform Data Set Version 3 Neuropsychological Battery are available for cognitively normal individuals based on age, education, and sex; however, these norms do not include race. We provide expanded norms for African Americans and whites. Methods: Data from 32 Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADCs) and ADC affiliated cohorts with global Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) Dementia Staging Instrument scores of 0 were included. Descriptive statistics for each test were calculated by age, sex, race, and education. Multiple linear regressions were conducted to estimate the effect of each demographic variable; squared semipartial correlation coefficients measured the relative importance of variables. Results: There were 8313 participants (16% African American) with complete demographic information, ranging from 6600 to 7885 depending on the test. Lower scores were found for older and less educated groups, and African Americans versus whites. Education was the strongest predictor for most tests, followed in order by age, race, and sex. Quadratic terms were significant for age and education, indicating some nonlinearity, but did not substantially increase R 2. Conclusions: Although race-based norms represent incomplete proxies for other sociocultural variables, the appropriate application of these norms is important given the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and to reduce misclassification bias in cognitive disorders of aging such as Alzheimer disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wad.0000000000000388

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Weintraub, 2018, Version 3 of the Alzheimer Disease Centers’ Neuropsychological Test Battery in the Uniform Data Set (UDS), Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 32, 10, 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000223 · DOI
  2. Nasreddine, 2005, The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment, J Am Geriatr Soc, 53, 695, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ivanova, 2013, The multilingual naming test in Alzheimer’s disease: clues to the origin of naming impairments, J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 19, 272, 10.1017/S1355617712001282 · DOI
  4. Possin, 2011, Distinct neuroanatomical substrates and cognitive mechanisms of figure copy performance in Alzheimer’s disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, Neuropsychologia, 49, 43, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.026 · DOI
  5. Monsell, 2016, Results from the NACC Uniform Data Set neuropsychological battery crosswalk study, Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 30, 134, 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000111 · DOI
  6. Dotson, 2008, Literacy-based normative data for low socioeconmic status African Americans, Clin Neuropsychol, 22, 989, 10.1080/13854040701679017 · DOI
  7. Manly, 2005, Advantages and disadvantages of separate norms for African Americans, Clin Neuropsychol, 19, 270, 10.1080/13854040590945346 · DOI
  8. Sisco, 2015, The role of early-life educational quality and literacy in explaining racial disparities in cognition in late life, J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 70, 557, 10.1093/geronb/gbt133 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Stasenko, 2019, The Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) as a measure of picture naming ability in Alzheimer’s disease, J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 25, 821, 10.1017/S1355617719000560 · DOI
  10. Werry, 2019, Group differences in normal neuropsychological test performance for older non-Hispanic White and Black/African American adults, Neuropsychology, 33, 1089, 10.1037/neu0000579 · DOI
  11. Carson, 2018, A re-examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 33, 379, 10.1002/gps.4756 · DOI
  12. Goldstein, 2014, Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a screen for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in African Americans, J Geriatr Psychiatry, 27, 199, 10.1177/0891988714524630 · DOI
  13. Waldron-Perrine, 2012, Determining an appropriate cutting score for indication of impairment on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 27, 1189, 10.1002/gps.3768 · DOI
  14. Ferman, 2005, Mayo’s Older African American Normative Studies: Auditory Verbal Learning Test norms for African American and Caucasian elders, Clin Neuropsychol, 19, 214, 10.1080/13854040590945300 · DOI
  15. Lucas, 2005, Mayo’s Older Adrican Americans Normative Studies: Norms for Boston Naming Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, Category Fluency, Animal Naming, Token Test, WRAT-3 Reading, Trail Making Test, Stroop Test, and Judgment of Line Orientation, Clin Neuropsychol, 19, 189, 10.1080/13854040590945292 · DOI
  16. Lucas, 2005, Mayo’s Older African Americans Normative Studies: normative data for commonly used clinical neuropsychological measures, Clin Neuropsychol, 19, 162, 10.1080/13854040590945265 · DOI
  17. Norman, 2011, Demographically corrected norms for African Americans and Caucasians on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, Stroop Color and Word Test, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-Card Version, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 33, 793, 10.1080/13803395.2011.559157 · DOI
  18. Schneider, 2015, Normative data for 8 neuropsychological tests in older blacks and whites from the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study, Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 29, 32, 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000042 · DOI
  19. Rilling, 2005, Mayo’s Older African American Normative Studies: Norms for the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, Clin Neuropsychol, 19, 229, 10.1080/13854040590945328 · DOI
  20. Morris, 1993, The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules, Neurology, 43, 2412, 10.1212/WNL.43.11.2412-a · DOI · Paper page
  21. Carr, 2005, Calcified coronary artery plaque measurement with cardiac CT in population-based studies: standardized protocol of Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, Radiology, 234, 35, 10.1148/radiol.2341040439 · DOI
  22. Manly, 2006, Deconstructing race and ethnicity: implications for measurement of health outcomes, Med Care, 44, S10, 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245427.22788.be · DOI · Paper page
  23. Manly, 2004, Acculturation, reading level, and neuropsychological test performance among African American elders, Appl Neuropsychol, 11, 37, 10.1207/s15324826an1101_5 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sachs, B. C., Steenland, K., Zhao, L., Hughes, T. M., Weintraub, S., Dodge, H. H., Barnes, L. L., Craft, S., Parker, M. L., & Goldstein, F. C.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Department of Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, School of Public Health
  • Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sachs, Bonnie C.
  • Parker, Monica L.
  • Goldstein, Felicia C.
Venue
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
Published
2020-05-29
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
191-197
ISSN
0893-0341 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3029498997
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95164-17-0-1, UL1TR001420, n01hc95165-34-0-1, n01hc95161-24-0-1, n01hc095169-003, n01hc95166-21-0-1, n01hc95162-31-0-1, 5p30ag062428-02, n01hc95168-27-0-1, n01hc95160-18-0-1, n01hc095167-000, UL1TR001079, n01hc95163-22-0-1, n01hc95159-40-0-1, UL1TR000040)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG054069, P30AG053760, P30AG010129, P30AG010133, P30-AG062428, P30AG049638, P30AG028383, P30AG012300, P50AG005133, U01AG016976, P50AG005138, P30AG010124, P50AG016573, P50AG047366, P30AG008017, P30AG010161, P30AG008051, P50AG008702, P30AG035982, P50AG005681, P50AG005142, P50AG047270, P30AG019610, P50AG005146, P30AG013846, P50AG005136, P30AG013854, P50AG025688, P50AG047266, R01AG058969, P30AG062429, P30AG066518, R01AG062624, P30AG062422, P30AG062715, P30AG062421, P30AG066511, P50AG023501)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC095169, N01-HC-095165, N01 HC095163, N01-HC-095159, N01 HC095168, N01-HC-095162, N01-HC-095161, HHSN268201500003C, HHSN26820150 0003I, N01 HC095167, N01-HC-095160, N01 HC095166, N01 HC095164)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
neuropsychological test battery, reference values, race, African Americans, cognitive aging, age effects, sex differences, Clinical Dementia Rating, misclassification bias, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, United States, Databases, Factual, White People, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review