Cited by 105Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma

Paraneoplastic neuropathy: wide-ranging clinicopathological manifestations

Koike, Haruki, Tanaka, Fumiaki, Sobue, Gen·2011·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

Purpose of review Recent progress in serological screening for paraneoplastic autoantibodies and diagnostic imaging techniques to detect malignancies has resulted in a broadening of the concept of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes through the characterization of nonclassical clinical features. The goal of this article was to review the recent literature describing the wide-ranging clinicopathological manifestations of paraneoplastic neuropathy. Recent findings The classical feature of paraneoplastic neuropathy is subacute sensory neuronopathy; in addition, sensorimotor neuropathies, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy, and vasculitic neuropathy, are sometimes observed. Some studies also describe the occurrence of autonomic neuropathies, including autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy and chronic gastrointestinal pseudo-obstruction. Whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) or FDG-PET/computed tomography may be helpful to detect malignancies that cannot be detected by conventional screening tests. The presence of paraneoplastic neuropathy should be considered in all patients with malignancy and can occur at any point in the disease, even during or after chemotherapy, radiation, or stem cell transplantation. The presence of paraneoplastic autoantibodies, especially anti-Hu and anti-CV2/CRMP-5 antibodies, may support the diagnosis of paraneoplastic neuropathy. Immunomodulatory treatmen…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wco.0b013e32834a87b7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because chest radiography may be unrevealing, chest computed tomography and/or whole-body FDG-PET can aid tumor detection and staging.

    “Because chest radiography may be unrevealing, chest computed tomography and/or whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) can aid tumor detection and staging (Koike et al., 2011).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 64 · Cited by 105

Authors
Koike, H., Tanaka, F., & Sobue, G.
Affiliations
Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Tanaka, Fumiaki
  • Sobue, Gen
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2011-10
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
504-510
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972914986
Cited by
105
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Keywords
paraneoplastic neuropathy, paraneoplastic neurological syndromes, Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy, vasculitic neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy, FDG-PET, anti-Hu antibodies, immunomodulatory therapy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, stem cell transplantation
MeSH terms
Autoantibodies, Humans, Paraneoplastic Polyneuropathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review