Paraneoplastic neuropathy: wide-ranging clinicopathological manifestations
Abstract
Purpose of review Recent progress in serological screening for paraneoplastic autoantibodies and diagnostic imaging techniques to detect malignancies has resulted in a broadening of the concept of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes through the characterization of nonclassical clinical features. The goal of this article was to review the recent literature describing the wide-ranging clinicopathological manifestations of paraneoplastic neuropathy. Recent findings The classical feature of paraneoplastic neuropathy is subacute sensory neuronopathy; in addition, sensorimotor neuropathies, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy, and vasculitic neuropathy, are sometimes observed. Some studies also describe the occurrence of autonomic neuropathies, including autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy and chronic gastrointestinal pseudo-obstruction. Whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) or FDG-PET/computed tomography may be helpful to detect malignancies that cannot be detected by conventional screening tests. The presence of paraneoplastic neuropathy should be considered in all patients with malignancy and can occur at any point in the disease, even during or after chemotherapy, radiation, or stem cell transplantation. The presence of paraneoplastic autoantibodies, especially anti-Hu and anti-CV2/CRMP-5 antibodies, may support the diagnosis of paraneoplastic neuropathy. Immunomodulatory treatmen…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because chest radiography may be unrevealing, chest computed tomography and/or whole-body FDG-PET can aid tumor detection and staging.
“Because chest radiography may be unrevealing, chest computed tomography and/or whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) can aid tumor detection and staging (Koike et al., 2011).”
From Autonomic nervous system and gastrointestinal manifestations with an emphasis on gastric dysfunction (2026) · cites this paper as Koike et al., 2011
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 64 · Cited by 105
- Authors
- Koike, H., Tanaka, F., & Sobue, G.
- Affiliations
- Nagoya University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Tanaka, Fumiaki
- Sobue, Gen
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Neurology
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 504-510
- ISSN
- 1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972914986
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
- Keywords
- paraneoplastic neuropathy, paraneoplastic neurological syndromes, Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy, vasculitic neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy, FDG-PET, anti-Hu antibodies, immunomodulatory therapy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, stem cell transplantation
- MeSH terms
- Autoantibodies, Humans, Paraneoplastic Polyneuropathy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review