The effects of guanfacine on working memory performance in patients with localization-related epilepsy and healthy controls
Abstract
Objectives Previous research has demonstrated that alpha2 agonists improve working memory performances in healthy individuals and in primates with prefrontal lesions. We conducted this study to determine whether the alpha2 agonist, guanfacine, could improve working memory performances in patients with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) and/or in those with focal epilepsy outside the frontal lobes (ie, temporal lobe epilepsy [TLE]). Methods Fourteen patients with FLE, 13 patients with TLE, and 10 healthy controls completed immediate and delayed match-to-sample tasks before and after ingestion of 2 to 3 mg of guanfacine. Results All 3 groups showed an increase in accuracy on the delayed match-to-sample task, but not the immediate match-to-sample task, following administration of guanfacine. Inspection of the group means revealed somewhat greater benefits for the control and FLE groups relative to the TLE group. Increased accuracy was not associated with slower performances in any group, suggesting that the cognitive benefits of guanfacine did not occur at the expense of increased sedation. Conclusions These data suggest that guanfacine improves working memory in patients with FLE and may be a viable treatment for attenuating such deficits in this patient population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Guanfacine activates dlPFC in human functional imaging studies.
“Guanfacine has also been shown to activate dlPFC in human functional imaging studies”
From Guanfacine’s mechanism of action in treating prefrontal cortical disorders: Successful translation across species (2020) · cites this paper as Swartz et al., 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 49 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Swartz, B. E., McDonald, C. R., Patel, A., & Torgersen, D.
- Affiliations
- Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Swartz, Barbara E.
- Venue
- Clinical Neuropharmacology
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 251-260
- ISSN
- 0362-5664 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077635500
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- guanfacine, working memory, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, frontal lobe epilepsy, temporal lobe epilepsy, focal epilepsy, matching-to-sample, cognitive enhancement, sedation, epilepsy treatment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Epilepsies, Partial, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Guanfacine, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review