Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 64Political Conflict and GovernanceMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesHealth and Conflict Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What happens when child soldiers grow up? The Mozambique case study

Boothby, Neil·2006·Intervention

Abstract

This article offers findings on the first longitudinal study of life outcomes for former child soldiers. Between 1988 and 2004, information was prospectively collected on 39 male former child soldiers in Mozambique. The data show that, after 16 years, the vast majority of this group of former child

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wtf.0b013e32801181ab

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Boothby, N.
Corresponding author
Boothby, Neil
Venue
Intervention
Publisher
Medknow
Published
2006-11
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
244-259
ISSN
1571-8883 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004277450
Cited by
64
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intervention (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
former child soldiers, life outcomes, longitudinal follow-up, Mozambique, armed conflict, childhood trauma, post-conflict transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.