Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polysubstance use: diagnostic challenges, patterns of use and health

Connor, Jason P., Gullo, Matthew J., White, Angela, Kelly, Adrian B.·2014·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Polysubstance use is common, particularly amongst some age groups and subcultures. It is also associated with elevated risk of psychiatric and physical health problems. We review the recent research findings, comment on changes to polysubstance diagnoses, report on contemporary clinical and epidemiological polysubstance trends, and examine the efficacy of preventive and treatment approaches. RECENT FINDINGS: Approaches to describing polysubstance use profiles are becoming more sophisticated. Models over the last 18 months that employ latent class analysis typically report a no use or limited-range cluster (alcohol, tobacco and marijuana), a moderate-range cluster (limited range and amphetamine derivatives), and an extended-range cluster (moderate range, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs and other illicit drugs). Prevalence rates vary as a function of the population surveyed. Wide-ranging polysubstance users carry higher risk of comorbid psychopathology, health problems, and deficits in cognitive functioning. SUMMARY: Wide-ranging polysubstance use is more prevalent in subcultures such as 'ravers' (dance club attendees) and those already dependent on substances. Health risks are elevated in these groups. Research into the prevention and treatment of polysubstance use is underdeveloped. There may be benefit in targeting specific polysubstance use and risk profiles in prevention and clinical research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000069

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Fernandez-Calderon, 2011, Polysubstance use patterns in underground rave attenders: a cluster analysis., J Drug Educ, 41, 183, 10.2190/DE.41.2.d · doi:10.2190/de.41.2.d
  2. Miller, 2013, Energy drinks and alcohol: research supported by industry may be downplaying harms., BMJ, 347, f5345, 10.1136/bmj.f5345 · doi:10.1136/bmj.f5345
  3. Garcia de Oliveira, 2013, Polydrug use among college students in Brazil: a nationwide survey., Rev Bras Psiquiatr, 35, 221, 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-0775 · doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2012-0775
  4. Measham, 2013, Exploring patterns of weekend polydrug use within local leisure scenes across the English night time economy., Criminol Crim Justice, 9, 437, 10.1177/1748895809343406 · doi:10.1177/1748895809343406
  5. Kelly, 2014, Is there any evidence of changes in patterns of concurrent drug use among young Australians 18-29 years between 2007 and 2010 Addict, Behav, 39, 1249

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
Connor, J. P., Gullo, M. J., White, A., & Kelly, A. B.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2014-07
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
269-275
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047211068
Cited by
461
References
65
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polysubstance use: diagnostic challenges, patterns of use and health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/yco.0000000000000069
The paper
Connor, J. P., Gullo, M. J., White, A., & Kelly, A. B. (2014). Polysubstance use: diagnostic challenges, patterns of use and health. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000069

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.