Cited by 32Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is e-health the answer to gaps in adolescent mental health service provision?

O’Dea, Bridianne, Calear, Alison L., Perry, Yael·2015·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Depression and anxiety are prevalent among adolescents; however, many young people do not seek help from professional services. This is due, in part, to the inadequacies of existing healthcare systems. This article aims to review the current evidence for e-health interventions for depression and anxiety in youth, as a potential solution to the gaps in mental health service provision. RECENT FINDINGS: Five randomized controlled trials reporting on e-health interventions for youth depression or anxiety were identified. Of these, two trials focused exclusively on anxiety symptoms, and three trials examined both anxiety and depression. The majority of trials assessed online cognitive behavioral therapy and focused on prevention rather than treatment. In all but one trial, results demonstrated positive effects for the e-health interventions, relative to the control. SUMMARY: There is growing evidence for the effectiveness of online cognitive behaviour therapy interventions for reducing the level of anxiety and depressive symptoms in adolescents aged between 12 and 18 years, when delivered in school and clinical settings, with some level of supervision. However, there are a number of gaps in the literature. More research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for prevention and treatment programs that are delivered via the internet, particularly for depression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000170

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cohen, 2009, Youth Studies Australia, 28, 13
  2. Andrews, 2014, Aust Fam Physician, 43, 838
  3. Palmqvist, 2007, Res, 7, 291

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
O’Dea, B., Calear, A. L., & Perry, Y.
Affiliations
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
O’Dea, Bridianne
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2015-07
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
336-342
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W256867111
Cited by
32
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
e-health, adolescent mental health, depression, anxiety, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, online intervention, mental health treatment gap, help-seeking, school-based intervention, prevention programs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Mental Health Services, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is e-health the answer to gaps in adolescent mental health service provision? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/yco.0000000000000170
The paper
O’Dea, B., Calear, A. L., & Perry, Y. (2015). Is e-health the answer to gaps in adolescent mental health service provision? Current Opinion in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000170