Cited by 52Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Diagnosis and classification of personality disorders: novel approaches

Mulder, Roger, Tyrer, Peter·2019·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

Purpose of review To provide an update of the recent studies, which have evaluated the radical changes in personality disorder classification in DSM-5 and ICD-11. Recent findings Although the DSM-5 Committee rejected the personality disorders Work Group proposal for personality disorder classification, the model was published in DSM-5 Section III. This Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) has been widely adopted by the research community resulting in multiple studies evaluating its reliability and clinical utility. The ICD-11 Personality Classification has recently been accepted by the WHO and is also receiving increasing study. Both models emphasize personality disorder severity, which most studies report is consistently linked to impairment and outcome. Both models propose five descriptive domains, which appear to capture most of the current personality disorder diagnoses, and can also be linked to disease extremes of normal personality such as the Five Factor Model. Summary The changes in DSM-5 AMPD and ICD-11 represent a significant paradigm shift in the diagnosis of personality disorders. Early research suggests that the changes may be beneficial for clinicians and researchers. The models more closely align with the large body of literature supporting dimensional models of normal personality. The severity dimensions are consistent with the large body of evidence that personality disorder severity is a strong determinant of impairment and outcome. It remains…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000461

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 52

Authors
Mulder, R., & Tyrer, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Mulder, Roger
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2019-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
27-31
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893816652
Cited by
52
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (07/01/26)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
personality disorders, personality disorder classification, DSM-5, ICD-11, Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, personality disorder severity, Big Five personality traits, dimensional models of personality, diagnostic classification, clinical utility
MeSH terms
Humans, Personality Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review