The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Pilot Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) uses a medical device that applies magnetic pulses noninvasively to the cortex of the brain to depolarize neurons. We tested its safety and efficacy in young persons with a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied to the right prefrontal cortex at 10 Hz, at 100% of the observed motor threshold, for 2000 pulses per session, in a 10-session course over 2 weeks in a sham-controlled crossover design (n=9). There was 1 week of no TMS between the active and sham phases. Safety of TMS was assessed by means of serial audiometry, neuropsychological testing, and electroencephalogram (EEG) at baseline, midpoint, and end point of the study. Efficacy was assessed as a primary outcome by changes in the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale and secondarily by change in the ADHD-IV scale. RESULTS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation was found to be safe, with no serious adverse events and no discontinuations due to adverse effects. All randomized subjects completed the full course of sessions. There were no significant changes in auditory thresholds or in electroencephalographic assessments. Neuropsychological testing showed no significant differences between active and sham groups. There was an overall significant improvement in the clinical global impression of improvement and the ADHD-IV scales across the study phases (active and sham TMS combined; P<0.01), but the change between active and sham TMS phases did not differ. CONCLUSION: Transcranial magnetic stimulation was found to be safe, with no serious adverse events observed in this pilot study. Improvement in symptoms was observed across the combined phases of the study, although there was no difference between the active and sham forms of TMS. Effects of clinical importance should be further assessed in larger controlled studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Clinical improvement were shown in both the sham and the real rTMS groups, suggesting placebo effects, while no effects were observed for neuropsychological or EEG measures (Weaver et al., 2012).”
From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Weaver et al., 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rubia, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00100 · Cited by 384
“Clinical improvement were shown in both the sham and the real rTMS groups, suggesting placebo effects, while no effects were observed for neuropsychological or EEG measures (Weaver et al., 2012).”
MethodSafety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents
Krishnan, C., Santos, L., Peterson, M. D., & Ehinger, M. (2015) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.012 · Cited by 292
“Several studies included in this review reported mild side effects after the application of rTMS [38,39,46,52,80,81,83,94].”
BackgroundMcGough, J. J., Sturm, A., Cowen, J., Tung, K., Salgari, G. C., Leuchter, A. F., Cook, I. A., Sugar, C. A., & Loo, S. K. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2018.11.013 · Cited by 131
Westwood, S. J., Raduà, J., & Rubia, K. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.190179 · Cited by 114
Non-invasive brain stimulation in children: Applications and future directions
Rajapakse, T., & Kirton, A. (2013) · Translational Neuroscience · doi:10.2478/s13380-013-0116-3 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Weaver, L., Rostain, A. L., Mace, W., Akhtar, U., Moss, E., & O’Reardon, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Magstim (United Kingdom) (GB)
- ORCID
- Moss, Edward
- Venue
- The Journal of ECT
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 98-103
- ISSN
- 1095-0680 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967686787
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Ect (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Keywords
- transcranial magnetic stimulation, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adolescents, young adults, right prefrontal cortex, non-invasive brain stimulation, treatment safety, treatment efficacy, neuropsychological outcomes, hearing threshold
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Audiometry, Mental Disorders, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Cross-Over Studies, Endpoint Determination, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review