Cited by 10Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ziprasidone augmentation for anxious depression

Open access
Ionescu, Dawn F., Shelton, Richard C., Baer, Lee, Meade, Kathryn H., Swee, Michaela B., Fava, Maurizio, Papakostas, George I.·2016·International Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Previously, we found an anxiolytic effect of ziprasidone augmentation to escitalopram (compared with placebo augmentation) in patients with depression in an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Here, we carried out a post-hoc analysis, comparing changes in the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Rating Scales between patients with anxious depression versus nonanxious depression, using a moderator analysis. Hamilton Depression Rating Scales total change scores from baseline and endpoint were not significantly different (interaction term P=0.91) in patients with anxious depression on ziprasidone augmentation (n=19; -9.1±4.9) or placebo (n=19; -6.1±8.9) versus patients without anxious depression on ziprasidone (n=52; -5.5±6.7) or placebo (n=49; -2.3±4.5). There was a trend toward statistical significance (interaction term P=0.1) in favor of patients without anxious depression for a difference in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total change scores from baseline to endpoint [patients with anxious depression on ziprasidone augmentation (n=19; -2.7±5.3) or placebo (n=19; -3.3±5.8) versus patients without anxious depression on ziprasidone (n=51; -3.9±6.6) or placebo (n=44; -0.9±4.7)]. Ziprasidone augmentation was equally efficacious in treating depression in patients with versus without anxious depression. However, the observed anxiolytic effect for patients with higher anxiety was not clinically significant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yic.0000000000000133

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cleary, 1977, Drugs Exp Clin Res, 21, 115
  2. Ionescu, 2014, Prim Care Companion CNS Disord, 16, e1
  3. Wu, 2013b, J Affect Disord, 150, 834, 10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.012 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Ionescu, D. F., Shelton, R. C., Baer, L., Meade, K. H., Swee, M. B., Fava, M., & Papakostas, G. I.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ionescu, Dawn F.
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2016-11
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
341-346
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2441766110
Cited by
10
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH081235, K23MH107776, R01MH081240)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
ziprasidone, escitalopram, augmentation therapy, anxious depression, anxiolytic effects, atypical antipsychotics, antidepressant efficacy, moderator analysis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Piperazines, Thiazoles, Antipsychotic Agents, Citalopram, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review