CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 185Schizophrenia research and treatmentTreatment of Major DepressionHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dose correspondence between olanzapine long-acting injection and oral olanzapine: recommendations for switching

Detke, Holland C., Zhao, Fangyi, Garhyan, Parag, Carlson, Janice, McDonnell, David·2011·International Clinical Psychopharmacology
DOI 10.1097/yic.0b013e32834093d1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Oral-to-depot dose correspondence was explored in a 24-week study of olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI). Patients with schizophrenia stabilized on oral olanzapine of 10, 15, or 20 mg/day (n=1065) were randomized to continue their oral treatment or switch directly to a fixed dose of olanzapine LAI [(mg/weeks) 45/4, 150/2, 405/4, or 300/2] without oral supplementation. Six-month relapse rates for each LAI-dose group stratified by earlier oral dose were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model assessing risk of relapse relative to each oral dose. Relapse rates for the therapeutic LAI doses (≥ 150 mg) varied depending on earlier oral dose, ranging from 1.5% (patients switched from 10 mg/day to 300 mg/2 weeks) to 18.8% (patients switched from 20 mg/day to 150 mg/2 weeks). Switching from 10 mg/day to 405 mg/4 weeks produced a comparable risk of relapse as remaining on that oral dose [Hazard ratio (HR)=1.03]. Switching from 15 or 20 mg/day to 300 mg/2 weeks produced comparable risk of relapse as remaining on those oral doses (HR=0.68 and 1.13, respectively). Pharmacokinetic modeling was conducted to evaluate the resulting dosing recommendations. Findings suggest that patients can be switched directly from oral to olanzapine LAI without the need for oral supplementation and with a low risk of relapse when initiated on an appropriate LAI dose.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yic.0b013e32834093d1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–185 of 185

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Detke, H. C., Zhao, F., Garhyan, P., Carlson, J., & McDonnell, D.
Affiliations
Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Detke, Holland C.
ORCID
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2011-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
35-42
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/yic.0b013e32834093d1
OpenAlex
W2090734001
Cited by
185
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 158 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
schizophrenia, relapse risk, pharmacokinetic modeling, antipsychotic dosing
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Benzodiazepines, Delayed-Action Preparations, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Routes, Female, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Drug Substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review