Association of DRD2 variants and Gilles de la Tourette syndrome in a family-based sample from a South American population isolate
Abstract
Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome (GTS) is a chronic neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by motor and vocal tics. Epidemiological evidence supports the importance of genetic factors in disease susceptibility, whereas pharmacological and neuroimaging studies have suggested a defect in the dopamine system. The dopamine receptor D2 gene (DRD2) has been reported to be associated with GTS and related phenotypes. Here, we evaluate genetic association between DRD2 and GTS in a sample from a South American population isolate (Antioquia, Colombia). We genotyped nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the DRD2 gene region in 69 GTS patients and their nuclear families and carried out both SNP and haplotype-based transmission distortion analysis. Evidence for association was found for three SNPs (rs6279, rs1079597 and rs4648318) and a five marker-haplotype comprising both rs6279 and rs1079597. Our findings replicate the association of DRD2 and GTS, and are consistent with the proposed connection between the dopamine system and this complex neuropsychiatric disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Variants in the DA receptor gene DRD2 have been associated with genetic risk for TS, but this finding is not consistent.
“Variants in the DA receptor gene DRD2 have also been associated with genetic risk for TS [626-628], but this finding is not consistent [629-633].”
From Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: animal models and clinical findings (2012) · cites this paper as [627]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Herzberg, I., Valencia-Duarte, A. V., Kay, V. A., White, D. J., Müller, H., Rivas, I. C., Mesa, S. C., Cuartas, M., García, J., Bedoya, G., Cornejo, W., Ruiz-Linares, A., & Kremeyer, B.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
- Venue
- Psychiatric Genetics
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 179-183
- ISSN
- 0955-8829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984772239
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatric Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Tourette Association of America
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS043538)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- Tourette syndrome, DRD2, dopamine D2 receptor, single nucleotide polymorphisms, haplotype association, family-based association, dopaminergic system, tic disorders
- MeSH terms
- Child, Family, Female, Tourette Syndrome, Haplotypes, Humans, Male, Mutation, South America, Linkage Disequilibrium, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genetic Loci
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review