Cited by 28Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

The discovery after 94 years of the elusive female of a myrmecolacid (Strepsiptera), and the cryptic species of Caenocholax fenyesi Pierce sensu lato

Open access
Kathirithamby, Jeyaraney, Spencer Johnston, J.·2004·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Due to its extreme sexual dimorphism and disparate hosts, no female myrmecolacid has been matched to its conspecific male to date. Here, for the first time to our knowledge, a morphological description is given of the matched female and male myrmecolacid, Caenocholax fenyesi waloffi ssp. nov. from Veracruz, Mexico: the female parasitic in a cricket and the male parasitic in an ant. For examined segments of DNA, the male and female are identical. Male C. fenyesi Pierce sensu lato was described 94 years ago from Veracruz. The male from Texas USA, which, for the same DNA segments, shows 15% divergence from the morphologically identical male from Veracruz, is given subspecies status, and is named Caenocholax fenyesi texensis ssp. nov. The discovery of the female finally enables many interesting studies to be pursued, such as speciation in morphologically cryptic taxa, the sexes of which parasitize disparate hosts. Caenocholax fenyesi sensu lato may also be evaluated for biocontrol of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren, which is a pest in the USA and Australia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0078

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The loss of complete metamorphosis may be more common than is currently appreciated.

    “Given the lack of knowledge concerning the pre-pupal biology of most insects (Hodin & Riddiford, 2000), which can be both highly cryptic (Kathirithamby & Johnston, 2004) and difficult to study (Mjöberg, 1925), the loss of complete metamorphosis may be more common than is currently appreciated.”

    From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Kathirithamby & Johnston, 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kathirithamby, J., & Spencer Johnston, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Department of Entomology, Texas A&amp;M University, College Station, TX 77843-2475, USA
Corresponding author
Kathirithamby, Jeyaraney
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2004-02-07
Volume
271
Issue
suppl_3
Pages
S5-8
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2050480430
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Keywords
Strepsiptera, female morphology, cryptic species, sexual dimorphism, host-parasite interactions, ant parasitism, subspecies status, speciation, biological control, Solenopsis invicta
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA, Female, Insecta, Male, Mexico, Sex Characteristics, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review