The discovery after 94 years of the elusive female of a myrmecolacid (Strepsiptera), and the cryptic species of Caenocholax fenyesi Pierce sensu lato
Open accessAbstract
Due to its extreme sexual dimorphism and disparate hosts, no female myrmecolacid has been matched to its conspecific male to date. Here, for the first time to our knowledge, a morphological description is given of the matched female and male myrmecolacid, Caenocholax fenyesi waloffi ssp. nov. from Veracruz, Mexico: the female parasitic in a cricket and the male parasitic in an ant. For examined segments of DNA, the male and female are identical. Male C. fenyesi Pierce sensu lato was described 94 years ago from Veracruz. The male from Texas USA, which, for the same DNA segments, shows 15% divergence from the morphologically identical male from Veracruz, is given subspecies status, and is named Caenocholax fenyesi texensis ssp. nov. The discovery of the female finally enables many interesting studies to be pursued, such as speciation in morphologically cryptic taxa, the sexes of which parasitize disparate hosts. Caenocholax fenyesi sensu lato may also be evaluated for biocontrol of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren, which is a pest in the USA and Australia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The loss of complete metamorphosis may be more common than is currently appreciated.
“Given the lack of knowledge concerning the pre-pupal biology of most insects (Hodin & Riddiford, 2000), which can be both highly cryptic (Kathirithamby & Johnston, 2004) and difficult to study (Mjöberg, 1925), the loss of complete metamorphosis may be more common than is currently appreciated.”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Kathirithamby & Johnston, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis
MCMAHON, D. P., & HAYWARD, A. (2016) · Ecological Entomology · doi:10.1111/een.12313 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kathirithamby, J., & Spencer Johnston, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2475, USA
- Corresponding author
- Kathirithamby, Jeyaraney
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2004-02-07
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- suppl_3
- Pages
- S5-8
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC1809985
- OpenAlex
- W2050480430
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Keywords
- Strepsiptera, female morphology, cryptic species, sexual dimorphism, host-parasite interactions, ant parasitism, subspecies status, speciation, biological control, Solenopsis invicta
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA, Female, Insecta, Male, Mexico, Sex Characteristics, Species Specificity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review