Cited by 199Marine animal studies overviewAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and Ecology

A killer whale social network is vulnerable to targeted removals

Open access
Williams, Rob, Lusseau, David·2006·Biology Letters

Abstract

Individuals play various roles in maintaining social integrity of mammalian populations. However, many models developed for managing wildlife resources assume that all individuals are equal. Killer whales are social animals that rely on relationships within and among family groups for survival. In the northeastern Pacific, fish-eating, 'resident' killer whale populations are composed of matrilines from which offspring do not disperse. We analysed the influence of various individuals' age, sex and matrilineal affiliation on their position in a social network. Here, we show that some matrilines appeared to play more central roles than others in the network. Furthermore, juvenile whales, especially females, appeared to play a central role in maintaining network cohesion. These two key findings were supported subsequently by simulating removal of different individuals. The network was robust to random removals; however, simulations that mimicked historic live-captures from the northeastern Pacific were likely to break the network graph into isolated groups. This finding raises concern regarding targeted takes, such as live-capture or drive fisheries, of matrilineal cetaceans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0510

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 199

Authors
Williams, R., & Lusseau, D.
Affiliations
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Raincoast Conservation SocietyPearse Island, PO Box 193, Alert Bay BC V0N 1A0, Canada
Corresponding author
Williams, Rob
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2006-06-29
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
497-500
ISSN
  • 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-957X
OpenAlex
W2122372559
Cited by
199
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Orcinus orca, social networks, live capture, network centrality, network cohesion, cetacean conservation
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Computer Simulation, Female, Male, Models, Biological, Social Behavior, Whale, Killer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review