Cited by 29Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Carbonaceous preservation of Cambrian hexactinellid sponge spicules

Open access
Harvey, Thomas H. P.·2010·Biology Letters

Abstract

Early fossil sponges offer a direct window onto the evolutionary emergence of animals, but insights are limited by the paucity of characters preserved in the conventional fossil record. Here, a new preservational mode for sponge spicules is reported from the lower Cambrian Forteau Formation (Newfoundland, Canada), prompting a re-examination of proposed homologies and sponge inter-relationships. The spicules occur as wholly carbonaceous films, and are interpreted as the remains of robust organic spicule sheaths. Comparable sheaths are restricted among living taxa to calcarean sponges, although the symmetries of the fossil spicules are characteristic of hexactinellid sponges. A similar extinct character combination has been documented in the Burgess Shale fossil Eiffelia . Interpreting the shared characters as homologous implies complex patterns of spicule evolution, but an alternative interpretation as convergent autapomorphies is more parsimonious. In light of the mutually exclusive distributions of these same characters among the crown groups, this result suggests that sponges exhibited an early episode of disparity expansion followed by comparatively constrained evolution, a pattern shared with many other metazoans but obscured by the conventional fossil record of sponges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0377

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stem-group sponges that may combine mineralogy and morphology of calcarean and hexactinellid spicules are reported from the Cambrian Series 2.

    “Stemgroup sponges, which may combine mineralogy and morphology of calcarean and hexactinellid spicules, are also reported from the Cambrian Series 2”

    From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Harvey, 2010

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 18 · Cited by 29

Authors
Harvey, T. H. P.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Harvey, Thomas H. P.
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2010-06-16
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
834-837
ISSN
  • 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-957X
OpenAlex
W2138995175
Cited by
29
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Department of Earth Sciences EPrints Repository (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
sponge spicules, hexactinellid sponges, Cambrian fossils, sponge evolution, homology, convergent evolution, autapomorphies, calcareous sponges, Burgess Shale, early animal evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Models, Biological, Newfoundland and Labrador, Phylogeny, Porifera, Preservation, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review