Carbonaceous preservation of Cambrian hexactinellid sponge spicules
Open accessAbstract
Early fossil sponges offer a direct window onto the evolutionary emergence of animals, but insights are limited by the paucity of characters preserved in the conventional fossil record. Here, a new preservational mode for sponge spicules is reported from the lower Cambrian Forteau Formation (Newfoundland, Canada), prompting a re-examination of proposed homologies and sponge inter-relationships. The spicules occur as wholly carbonaceous films, and are interpreted as the remains of robust organic spicule sheaths. Comparable sheaths are restricted among living taxa to calcarean sponges, although the symmetries of the fossil spicules are characteristic of hexactinellid sponges. A similar extinct character combination has been documented in the Burgess Shale fossil Eiffelia . Interpreting the shared characters as homologous implies complex patterns of spicule evolution, but an alternative interpretation as convergent autapomorphies is more parsimonious. In light of the mutually exclusive distributions of these same characters among the crown groups, this result suggests that sponges exhibited an early episode of disparity expansion followed by comparatively constrained evolution, a pattern shared with many other metazoans but obscured by the conventional fossil record of sponges.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stem-group sponges that may combine mineralogy and morphology of calcarean and hexactinellid spicules are reported from the Cambrian Series 2.
“Stemgroup sponges, which may combine mineralogy and morphology of calcarean and hexactinellid spicules, are also reported from the Cambrian Series 2”
From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Harvey, 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 18 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Harvey, T. H. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Harvey, Thomas H. P.
- ORCID
- Harvey, Thomas H. P.
- Venue
- Biology Letters
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2010-06-16
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 834-837
- ISSN
- 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-957X
- PMC
- PMC3001373
- OpenAlex
- W2138995175
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Department of Earth Sciences EPrints Repository (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- sponge spicules, hexactinellid sponges, Cambrian fossils, sponge evolution, homology, convergent evolution, autapomorphies, calcareous sponges, Burgess Shale, early animal evolution
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Models, Biological, Newfoundland and Labrador, Phylogeny, Porifera, Preservation, Biological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review