Ventral motion parallax enhances fruit fly steering to visual sideslip
Open accessAbstract
Flies and other insects use incoherent motion (parallax) to the front and sides to measure distances and identify obstacles during translation. Although additional depth information could be drawn from below, there is no experimental proof that they use it. The finding that blowflies encode motion disparities in their ventral visual fields suggests this may be an important region for depth information. We used a virtual flight arena to measure fruit fly responses to optic flow. The stimuli appeared below (n= 51) or above the fly (n= 44), at different speeds, with or without parallax cues. Dorsal parallax does not affect responses, and similar motion disparities in rotation have no effect anywhere in the visual field. But responses to strong ventral sideslip (206° s−1) change drastically depending on the presence or absence of parallax. Ventral parallax could help resolve ambiguities in cluttered motion fields, and enhance corrective responses to nearby objects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These spatial phenomena depend constitutively on the ability to distinguish self-motion via action, giving an agentive view of self-location and perspective.
“Each of these depend constitutively on the ability to distinguish self-motion via action [64,66], giving what is known as an agentive view of self-location and perspective [34].”
From Phenomenal interface theory: a model for basal consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [64]
The Discussion (‘Dealing with ambiguity’; page unavailable) says ventral optic-flow parallax may help flies distinguish translational from rotational self-motion. It does not establish that spatial phenomena depend constitutively on distinguishing self-motion via action. The ‘agentive view’ phrase is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [18]Egelhaaf M 1985 On the neuronal basis of figure–ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly II: figure-detection cells, a new class of visual interneurons. Biol. Cybern. 52, 195– 209. (10.1007/BF00339948) · DOI
- Authors
- Ruiz, C., & Theobald, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ruiz, Carlos
- Venue
- Biology Letters
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 20200046
- ISSN
- 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-957X
- PMC
- PMC7280038
- OpenAlex
- W3028198052
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Biology Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (IOS-1750833)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Keywords
- optical flow, depth perception, insect flight control, Calliphoridae
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Flight, Animal, Motion, Motion Perception, Optic Flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review