Cited by 6Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFossil Insects in AmberEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Earliest evidence of avian primary feather moult

Open access
Wang, Xiaoli, O'Connor, Jingmai, Zheng, Xiaoting, Wang, Yan, Kiat, Yosef·2024·Biology Letters

Abstract

Feather moulting is a crucial process in the avian life cycle, which evolved to maintain plumage functionality. However, moulting involves both energetic and functional costs. During moulting, plumage function temporarily decreases between the shedding of old feathers and the full growth of new ones. In flying taxa, a gradual and sequential replacement of flight feathers evolved to maintain aerodynamic capabilities during the moulting period. Little is known about the moult strategies of non-avian pennaraptoran dinosaurs and stem birds, before the emergence of crown lineage. Here, we report on two Early Cretaceous pygostylian birds from the Yixian Formation (125 mya), probably referable to Confuciusornithiformes, exhibiting morphological characteristics that suggest a gradual and sequential moult of wing flight feathers. Short primary feathers interpreted as immature are symmetrically present on both wings, as is typical among extant flying birds. Our survey of the enormous collection of the Tianyu Museum confirms previous findings that evidence of active moult in non-neornithine pennaraptorans is rare and likely indicates a moult cycle greater than one year. Documenting moult in Mesozoic feathered dinosaurs is critical for understanding their ecology, locomotor ability and the evolution of this important life-history process in birds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0106

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The remiges of Archaeopteryx would have molted sequentially.

    “However, comparison with volant paravians Microraptor and Confuciusornis strongly suggests the remiges would have molted sequentially [110, 111] whereas the non-volant Anchiornis exhibits an irregular molt [4].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [111]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 6

Authors
Wang, X., O'Connor, J., Zheng, X., Wang, Y., & Kiat, Y.
Affiliations
  • Linyi University (CN)
  • Field Museum of Natural History (US)
  • Shandong Pingyi Tianyu Museum of Natural History (CN)
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2024-07
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
20240106-20240106
ISSN
  • 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-957X
OpenAlex
W4400224563
Cited by
6
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Negaunee Foundation
  • NSFC (42288201)
  • Zuckerman STEM Leadership Program
  • Field Museum of Natural History
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
feather moult, primary feathers, flight feathers, Lower Cretaceous, Yixian Formation, feathered dinosaurs, moult cycle, flight evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, China, Biological Evolution, Feathers, Flight, Animal, Fossils, Wings, Animal, Molting, Dinosaurs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review