The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On methods for studying stochastic disease dynamics
Open accessAbstract
Models that deal with the individual level of populations have shown the importance of stochasticity in ecology, epidemiology and evolution. An increasingly common approach to studying these models is through stochastic (event-driven) simulation. One striking disadvantage of this approach is the need for a large number of replicates to determine the range of expected behaviour. Here, for a class of stochastic models called Markov processes, we present results that overcome this difficulty and provide valuable insights, but which have been largely ignored by applied researchers. For these models, the so-called Kolmogorov forward equation (also called the ensemble or master equation) allows one to simultaneously consider the probability of each possible state occurring. Irrespective of the complexities and nonlinearities of population dynamics, this equation is linear and has a natural matrix formulation that provides many analytical insights into the behaviour of stochastic populations and allows rapid evaluation of process dynamics. Here, using epidemiological models as a template, these ensemble equations are explored and results are compared with traditional stochastic simulations. In addition, we describe further advantages of the matrix formulation of dynamics, providing simple exact methods for evaluating expected eradication (extinction) times of diseases, for comparing expected total costs of possible control programmes and for estimation of disease parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trefethen, L. N., & Bau, III (1997) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719574 · Cited by 3,301 · cited 1×
“In general, the sparse nature of Q (here only 3NC1 terms out of (NC1)2 are non-zero) means that we can exploit a range of powerful numerical techniques to find dominant eigenvalues (Golub & van Loan 1996; Trefethen & Bau 1997).”
BackgroundAggregation, Variance and the Mean
TAYLOR, L. R. (1961) · Nature · doi:10.1038/189732a0 · Cited by 2,496
Cited by
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
Mathematical models of infectious disease transmission
Grassly, N. C., & Fraser, C. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1845 · Cited by 744
Stochastic formulation of ecological models and their applications
Black, A. J., & McKane, A. J. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.014 · Cited by 255
Asher, L., Collins, L. M., Ortiz-Pelaez, A., Drewe, J. A., Nicol, C. J., & Pfeiffer, D. U. (2009) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0221 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Keeling, M. J., & Ross, J. V.
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2007-07-17
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 171-181
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-5689
- OpenAlex
- W2132192754
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On methods for studying stochastic disease dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsif.2007.1106
- The paper
- Keeling, M. J., & Ross, J. V. (2008). On methods for studying stochastic disease dynamics. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2007.1106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.