The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A quantitative comparison of bird and bat wakes
Open accessAbstract
Qualitative comparison of bird and bat wakes has demonstrated significant differences in the structure of the far wake. Birds have been found to have a unified vortex wake of the two wings, while bats have a more complex wake with gradients in the circulation along the wingspan, and with each wing generating its own vortex structure. Here, we compare quantitative measures of the circulation in the far wake of three bird and one bat species. We find that bats have a significantly stronger normalized circulation of the start vortex than birds. We also find differences in how the circulation develops during the wingbeat as demonstrated by the ratio of the circulation of the dominant start vortex and the total circulation of the same sense. Birds show a more prominent change with changing flight speed and a relatively weaker start vortex at minimum power speed than bats. We also find that bats have a higher normalized wake loading based on the start vortex, indicating higher relative induced drag and therefore less efficient lift generation than birds. Our results thus indicate fundamental differences in the aerodynamics of bird and bat flight that will further our understanding of the evolution of vertebrate flight.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These alternative ecological pathways may have influenced the evolution of their aerofoils, which has implications for wing kinematics, aerodynamics, and body size constraints.
“These alternative ecological pathways may have influenced the evolution of their aerofoils (feathers versus skin membranes), which has implications for wing kinematics, aerodynamics, and body size constraints [127], [128].”
From Assessing Arboreal Adaptations of Bird Antecedents: Testing the Ecological Setting of the Origin of the Avian Flight Stroke (2011) · cites this paper as [128]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Anderson J. D., 2006, Fundamentals of aerodynamics
- 10.1098/rsif.2008.0027 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsif.2005.0091 · DOI
- 10.1163/157075606778967856 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1142281 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.012146 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.018192 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1153019 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-83848-4 · DOI
- Pennycuick C. J., 1989, Bird flight performance: a practical calculation manual
- 10.1017/S0022112079000422 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsif.2007.0215 · DOI
- 10.1038/350421a0 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.00423 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.007823 · DOI
- 10.1159/000109964 · DOI
- 10.1088/1748-3182/1/4/S02 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature03647 · DOI
- 10.1007/s003600050126 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dececchi, T. A., & Larsson, H. C. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022292 · Cited by 56
“aerodynamics, and body size constraints [127,128].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Johansson, L. C., Wolf, M., & Hedenström, A.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Johansson, L. Christoffer
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2009-03-25
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 61-66
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-5689
- PMC
- PMC2839372
- OpenAlex
- W2130402752
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
- Keywords
- bird flight, bat flight, wake vortices, circulation, far wake, wing beat, induced drag, lift generation, flight efficiency, flight speed
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birds, Chiroptera, Computer Simulation, Flight, Animal, Models, Biological, Species Specificity, Wings, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review