The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kinematic measures for assessing gait stability in elderly individuals: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Falls not only present a considerable health threat, but the resulting treatment and loss of working days also place a heavy economic burden on society. Gait instability is a major fall risk factor, particularly in geriatric patients, and walking is one of the most frequent dynamic activities of daily living. To allow preventive strategies to become effective, it is therefore imperative to identify individuals with an unstable gait. Assessment of dynamic stability and gait variability via biomechanical measures of foot kinematics provides a viable option for quantitative evaluation of gait stability, but the ability of these methods to predict falls has generally not been assessed. Although various methods for assessing gait stability exist, their sensitivity and applicability in a clinical setting, as well as their cost-effectiveness, need verification. The objective of this systematic review was therefore to evaluate the sensitivity of biomechanical measures that quantify gait stability among elderly individuals and to evaluate the cost of measurement instrumentation required for application in a clinical setting. To assess gait stability, a comparative effect size (Cohen's d ) analysis of variability and dynamic stability of foot trajectories during level walking was performed on 29 of an initial yield of 9889 articles from four electronic databases. The results of this survey demonstrate that linear variability of temporal measures of swing and stance was most capable of distinguishing between fallers and non-fallers, whereas step width and stride velocity prove more capable of discriminating between old versus young (OY) adults. In addition, while orbital stability measures (Floquet multipliers) applied to gait have been shown to distinguish between both elderly fallers and non-fallers as well as between young and old adults, local stability measures ( λ s) have been able to distinguish between young and old adults. Both linear and nonlinear measures of foot time series during gait seem to hold predictive ability in distinguishing healthy from fall-prone elderly adults. In conclusion, biomechanical measurements offer promise for identifying individuals at risk of falling and can be obtained with relatively low-cost tools. Incorporation of the most promising measures in combined retrospective and prospective studies for understanding fall risk and designing preventive strategies is warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
Hozo, S. P., Djulbegovic, B., & Hozo, I. (2005) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13 · Cited by 9,062
Risk Factors for Falls among Elderly Persons Living in the Community
Tinetti, M. E., Speechley, M., & Ginter, S. F. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198812293192604 · Cited by 6,509
Performance‐Oriented Assessment of Mobility Problems in Elderly Patients
Tinetti, M. E. (1986) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x · Cited by 3,352
How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1187 · Cited by 3,026
Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: A 1-year prospective study
Hausdorff, J. M., Rios, D. A., & Edelberg, H. K. (2001) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.24893 · Cited by 2,313
Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons
Society, A. G., Society, G., Of, A. A., & On Falls Prevention, O. S. P. (2001) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49115.x · Cited by 2,242
Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging
Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Peng, C.-K., & Stanley, H. E. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.012579499 · Cited by 2,205
Gait Changes in Older Adults: Predictors of Falls or Indicators of Fear?
Maki, B. E. (1997) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb00946.x · Cited by 1,721
Weinstein, N. D. (1987) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf00846146 · Cited by 1,296
Cited by
Rogan, S., Radlinger, L., Hilfiker, R., Schmidtbleicher, D., de Bie, R. A., & de Bruin, E. D. (2015) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0021-4 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamacher, D., Singh, N. B., Van Dieën, J. H., Heller, M. O., & Taylor, W. R.
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2011-08-31
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 65
- Pages
- 1682-1698
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-5689
- OpenAlex
- W2154338003
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 105
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinematic measures for assessing gait stability in elderly individuals: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsif.2011.0416
- The paper
- Hamacher, D., Singh, N. B., Van Dieën, J. H., Heller, M. O., & Taylor, W. R. (2011). Kinematic measures for assessing gait stability in elderly individuals: a systematic review. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.