Cited by 29Mathematical Biology Tumor GrowthGene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

Mathematical models incorporating a multi-stage cell cycle replicate normally-hidden inherent synchronization in cell proliferation

Open access
Vittadello, Sean T., McCue, Scott W., Gunasingh, Gency, Haass, Nikolas K., Simpson, Matthew J.·2019·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We present a suite of experimental data showing that cell proliferation assays, prepared using standard methods thought to produce asynchronous cell populations, persistently exhibit inherent synchronization. Our experiments use fluorescent cell cycle indicators to reveal the normally hidden cell synchronization, by highlighting oscillatory subpopulations within the total cell population. These oscillatory subpopulations would never be observed without these cell cycle indicators. On the other hand, our experimental data show that the total cell population appears to grow exponentially, as in an asynchronous population. We reconcile these seemingly inconsistent observations by employing a multi-stage mathematical model of cell proliferation that can replicate the oscillatory subpopulations. Our study has important implications for understanding and improving experimental reproducibility. In particular, inherent synchronization may affect the experimental reproducibility of studies aiming to investigate cell cycle-dependent mechanisms, including changes in migration and drug response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsif.2019.0382

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The treatment of cell migration via continuum PDEs is well established in biophysics, as is the role of cell arrangement in determining aspects of the progression of cancers.

    “The treatment of cell migration via continuum PDEs is well established in biophysics36,37,38, as is the role of cell arrangement in determining aspects of the progression of cancers39.”

    From Inference of weak-form partial differential equations describing migration and proliferation mechanisms in wound healing experiments on cancer cells (2025) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Introduction discusses mathematical models of cell proliferation, and §2.2 uses differential equations for cell-cycle-stage populations. Our copy does not address continuum PDE models of cell migration or the effect of cell arrangement on cancer progression; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 29

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [1]1. Sherratt JA, Murray JD. 1990 Models of epidermal wound healing. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 241 , 29 -36. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1990.0061) · DOI
  2. [2]2. Swanson KR, Bridge C, Murray JD, Alvord EC. 2003 Virtual and real brain tumors: using mathematical modeling to quantify glioma growth and invasion. J. Neurol. Sci. 216 , 1 -10. (doi:10.1016/j. jns.2003.06.001) · DOI
  3. [4]4. Scott JG, Basanta D, Anderson ARA, Gerlee P. 2013 A mathematical model of tumour self-seeding reveals secondary metastatic deposits as drivers of primary tumour growth. J. R. Soc. Interface 10 , 20130011. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0011) · DOI
  4. [5]5. Sarapata EA, de Pillis LG. 2014 A comparison and catalog of intrinsic tumor growth models. Bull. Math. Biol. 76 , 2010 -2024. (doi:10.1007/s11538014-9986-y) · DOI
  5. [6]6. Böttcher MA, Dingli D, Werner B, Traulsen A. 2018 Replicative cellular age distributions in compartmentalized tissues. J. R. Soc. Interface 15 , 20180272. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2018.0272) · DOI
  6. [7]7. Treloar KK, Simpson MJ, McElwain DLS, Baker RE. 2014 Are in vitro estimates of cell diffusivity and cell proliferation rate sensitive to assay geometry? - J. Theor. Biol. 356 , 71 -84. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2014. 04.026) · DOI
  7. [9]9. Sakaue-Sawano A et al. 2008 Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell 132 , 487 -498. (doi:10.1016/j.cell. 2007.12.033) · DOI
  8. [10]10. Beaumont KA, Hill DS, Daignault SM, Lui GYL, Sharp DM, Gabrielli B, Weninger W, Haass NK. 2016 Cell cycle phase-specific drug resistance as an escape mechanism of melanoma cells. J. Invest. Dermatol. 136 , 1479 -1489. (doi:10.1016/j.jid.2016.02.805) · DOI
  9. [11]11. Otani K, Naito Y, Sakaguchi Y, Seo Y, Takahashi Y, Kikuta J, Ogawa K, Ishii M. 2016 Cell-cycle-controlled radiation therapy was effective for treating a murine malignant melanoma cell line in vitro and in vivo . Sci. Rep. 6 , 30689. (doi:10.1038/srep30689) · DOI
  10. [12]12. Bae H, Go YH, Kwon T, Sung BJ, Cha HJ. 2019 A theoretical model for the cell cycle and drug induced cell cycle arrest of FUCCI systems with cellto-cell variation during mitosis. Pharm. Res. 36 , 57. (doi:10.1007/s11095-019-2570-2) · DOI
  11. [13]13. Taylor IW, Hodson PJ. 1984 Cell cycle regulation by environmental pH. J. Cell. Physiol. 121 , 517 -525. (doi:10.1002/jcp.1041210310) · DOI
  12. [17]17. Vittadello ST, McCue SW, Gunasingh G, Haass NK, Simpson MJ. 2018 Mathematical models for cell migration with real-time cell cycle dynamics. Biophys. J. 114 , 1241 -1253. (doi:10.1016/j.bpj. 2017.12.041) · DOI
  13. [18]18. Simpson MJ, Jin W, Vittadello ST, Tambyah TA, Ryan JM, Gunasingh G, Haass NK, McCue SW. 2018 Stochastic models of cell invasion with fluorescent cell cycle indicators. Physica A 510 , 375 -386. (doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.06.128) · DOI
  14. [20]20. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. 2011 Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144 , 646 -674. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013) · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Vittadello, S. T., McCue, S. W., Gunasingh, G., Haass, N. K., & Simpson, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Translational Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Simpson, Matthew J.
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2019-08
Volume
16
Issue
157
Pages
20190382
ISSN
  • 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-5689
OpenAlex
W2969950545
Cited by
29
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (DP170100474)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (AP1084893)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
cell cycle synchronization, cell proliferation, asynchronous cell populations, exponential growth, experimental reproducibility
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, Fluorescence, Humans, Models, Biological, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review