Expanding the measurement of culture with a sample of two billion humans
Open accessAbstract
Culture has played a pivotal role in human evolution. Yet, the ability of social scientists to study culture is limited by the currently available measurement instruments. Scholars of culture must regularly choose between scalable but sparse survey-based methods or restricted but rich ethnographic methods. Here, we demonstrate that massive online social networks can advance the study of human culture by providing quantitative, scalable and high-resolution measurement of behaviourally revealed cultural values and preferences. We employ data across nearly 60 000 topic dimensions drawn from two billion Facebook users across 225 countries and territories. We first validate that cultural distances calculated from this measurement instrument correspond to traditional survey-based and objective measures of cross-national cultural differences. We then demonstrate that this expanded measure enables rich insight into the cultural landscape globally at previously impossible resolution. We analyse the importance of national borders in shaping culture and compare subnational divisiveness with gender divisiveness across countries. Our measure enables detailed investigation into the geopolitical stability of countries, social cleavages within small- and large-scale human groups, the integration of migrant populations and the disaffection of certain population groups from the political process, among myriad other potential future applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As LLMs are trained from curated datasets and fine-tuned using human feedback, quantifying the biases that are introduced and/or mitigated by these models is crucial.
“However, as LLMs are trained from curated datasets and fine-tuned using human feedback, quantifying the biases that are introduced and/or mitigated by these models is crucial 179,180 .”
From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [179]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 30
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [56]Brewer J. 2000 Ethnography. Milton Keynes, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
- [67]Muthukrishna M, Bell A, Henrich J, Curtin C, Gedranovich A, McInerney J, Thue B. 2020 Beyond WEIRD psychology: measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychol. Sci 31, 678- 701. (10.2139/ssrn.3259613) 32437234 PMC7357184 · DOI · Paper page
- [75]Henrich JP. 2016 The secret of our success: how culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Authors
- Obradovich, N., Özak, Ö., Martín, I., Ortuño-Ortín, I., Awad, E., Cebrián, M., Cuevas, R., Desmet, K., Rahwan, I., & Cuevas, Á.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- Southern Methodist University (US)
- Nommon Solutions and Technologies (Spain) (ES)
- Department of Economics,Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28903 Getafe (Madrid), Spain
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
- Department of Economics and Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75205, USA
- Department of Telematic Engineering and UC3M-Santander Big Data Institute, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés (Madrid), Spain
- Corresponding author
- Rahwan, Iyad
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 190
- Pages
- 20220085-20220085
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9131129
- OpenAlex
- W3089241628
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Fundación BBVA (Project AERIS)
- TapTap Digital (Taptap Digital-UC3M Chair in Advanced AI and Data)
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (ECO2013-42710-P, MDM 2014-0431)
- Comunidad de Madrid (UE-MEASURE-CM-UC3M)
- European Commission (H2020 PIMCITY Project. Grant No 871370, H2020 Testable Project. Grant No 101019206)
- Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (FPU15/03518)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Keywords
- cultural values, cultural measurement, social networking sites, Facebook, cultural distance, national borders, gender differences, geopolitical stability, social cleavages, immigrant integration, political disaffection, human evolution
- MeSH terms
- Anthropology, Cultural, Culture, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review