Predicting phenotype transition probabilities via conditional algorithmic probability approximations
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Unravelling the structure of genotype–phenotype (GP) maps is an important problem in biology. Recently, arguments inspired by algorithmic information theory (AIT) and Kolmogorov complexity have been invoked to uncover simplicity bias in GP maps, an exponentially decaying upper bound in phenotype probability with the increasing phenotype descriptional complexity. This means that phenotypes with many genotypes assigned via the GP map must be simple, while complex phenotypes must have few genotypes assigned. Here, we use similar arguments to bound the probability P(x → y) that phenotype x, upon random genetic mutation, transitions to phenotype y. The bound is P(x→y)≲2−aK~(y|x)−b, where K~(y|x) is the estimated conditional complexity of y given x, quantifying how much extra information is required to make y given access to x. This upper bound is related to the conditional form of algorithmic probability from AIT. We demonstrate the practical applicability of our derived bound by predicting phenotype transition probabilities (and other related quantities) in simulations of RNA and protein secondary structures. Our work contributes to a general mathematical understanding of GP maps and may facilitate the prediction of transition probabilities directly from examining phenotype themselves, without utilizing detailed knowledge of the GP map.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Pantazes, R. J., & Maranas, C. D. (2010) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzq061 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Manrubia, S., Cuesta, J. A., Aguirre, J., Ahnert, S. E., Altenberg, L., Cano, A. V., Catalán, P., Diaz-Uriarte, R., Elena, S. F., García-Martín, J. A., et al. (2021) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2021.03.004 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citationAn End to Endless Forms: Epistasis, Phenotype Distribution Bias, and Nonuniform Evolution
Borenstein, E., & Krakauer, D. C. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000202 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Dingle, K., Novev, J. K., Ahnert, S. E., & Louis, A. A.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dingle, Kamaludin
- Ahnert, Sebastian E.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2022-12-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 197
- Pages
- 20220694-20220694
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9748496
- OpenAlex
- W4311369548
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Apollo (cc-by)
- Funders
- Gulf University for Science and Technology (263301)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- genotype-phenotype mapping, conditional complexity, Kolmogorov complexity, algorithmic information theory, simplicity bias, RNA secondary structure, protein secondary structure
- MeSH terms
- Genotype, Information Theory, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Phenotype, Probability, Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review