The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sir William Brooke O' Shaughnessy, F. R. S. (1809-1889) Anglo-Indian forensic chemist
Abstract
The origins of forensic chemistry are to be found in the practice of A forensic medicine in past centuries. When one considers the evolution of the ancient professions of law and medicine it is obvious that some interaction had to occur in the areas of murder, suicide, and public health. Since poisons could be involved, it is not surprising that early medico-legal records reveal that physicians had to be acquainted with the toxicological aspects of arsenic, mercury, lead and copper and plant poisons such as opium and hemlock (1). The pace of legal codification and medical discovery increased markedly in the sixteenth century. In the latter half of that century the medical men on the Continent began regarding forensic medicine as a speciality, as evidenced by the appearance of publications and the initiation of the first systematic instruction in the subject. The seventeenth century witnessed interest and understanding of the field. Germany was the dominant country in this expansion, followed by France and Italy, with Great Britain registering little impact. Some scattered and generally unsatisfactory beginnings to eliminate this last deficiency appeared in the late eighteenth century (2). The turn of the new century saw a significant advance in the establishment of the first chair of medical jurisprudence at the University of Edinburgh in 1807, occupied initially by Andrew Duncan (1744—1828). W ith the foundation of this professorship British forensic medicine fairly blossomed and entered the mainstream of the study alongside the Continental countries. By the end of the first quarter of the nineteenth century every medical student in Great Britain had access to a course in the forensic applications of his field either through a university professor or the extra-mural practitioners of this subject.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“From the late eighteenth century the British East India Company, which expected to profit from the sale of medicinal plants and animals, also began to support naturalists and its staff members in collecting specimens from the Far East, and to purchase drawings of native plants and animals for identification and collection.$^{7}$^{3}”
From Transnational Travels of the Caterpillar Fungus in the Fifteenth through Nineteenth Centuries (2017) · cites this paper as [73]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transnational Travels of the Caterpillar Fungus in the Fifteenth through Nineteenth Centuries
Lu, D. (2017) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341387 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Gorman, M.
- Affiliations
- University of San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gorman, Mel
- Venue
- Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1984-09-30
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-64
- ISSN
- 0035-9149 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-0178
- OpenAlex
- W2162760409
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Historical and Scientific Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Biographical and Historical Analysis
- Keywords
- forensic chemistry, forensic medicine, history of forensic medicine, toxicology, University of Edinburgh
- MeSH terms
- Biochemistry, Chemistry, Forensic Medicine, United Kingdom, India, Science, History, Modern 1601-
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review