Cited by 3Human Pose and Action RecognitionZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsCell Image Analysis Techniques

PoseR: a deep learning toolbox for classifying animal behaviour

Open access
Mullen, Pierce N., Bowlby, Beatrice, Armstrong, Holly C., Gray, Angus, Zwart, Maarten F.·2026·Open Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The actions of animals provide a window into how their minds work. Recent advances in deep learning are providing powerful approaches to recognize patterns of animal movement from video recordings using markerless pose estimation models. Current methods for classifying animal behaviour using the outputs of these models often rely on species and task-specific feature engineering of trajectories, kinematics and task programming. Generalized solutions that use only pose estimations and the inherent structure of animals and their environment provide an opportunity to develop foundational, contextual and, importantly, standardized animal behaviour models for efficient and reproducible behavioural analysis. Here, we present PoseRecognition (PoseR), a behavioural classifier using spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks. We show that it can be used to classify animal behaviour quickly and accurately from pose estimations, using zebrafish larvae, Drosophila melanogaster, mice and rats as model organisms. Our easily accessible tool simplifies the behavioural analysis workflow by transforming coordinates of animal position and pose into semantic labels with speed and precision. The design of our tool ensures scalability and versatility for use across multiple species and contexts, improving the efficiency of behavioural analysis across fields.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsob.250322

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Mullen, P. N., Bowlby, B., Armstrong, H. C., Gray, A., & Zwart, M. F.
Affiliations
University of St Andrews (GB)
Venue
Open Biology
Published
2026-01-21
Volume
16
Issue
1
ISSN
2046-2441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7125133328
Cited by
3
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Open Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • RS Macdonald Charitable Trust
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
animal behavior classification, markerless pose estimation, spatio-temporal graph convolutional network, zebrafish larvae, Drosophila melanogaster, mice, rats, animal movement, model organisms
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Graph Neural Networks, Classification Algorithms, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Drosophila melanogaster, Video Recording, Zebrafish, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review