Cited by 7Pacific and Southeast Asian StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesForensic and Genetic Research

Origin and timing of New Zealand's earliest domestic chickens: Polynesian commensals or European introductions?

Open access
Wood, Jamie R., Herrera, Michael J. B., Scofield, R. Paul, Wilmshurst, Janet M.·2016·Royal Society Open Science

Abstract

Human settlers transported chickens ( Gallus gallus domesticus ) to most East Polynesian archipelagos between AD 1000 and 1300; however, it has long been assumed that New Zealand was an exception. Despite the fact that chicken bones have been recovered from localities of early archaeological middens in New Zealand, their age and genetic relationships have never been critically assessed. Here, we test the assumption that chickens were not introduced to New Zealand during prehistory through ancient DNA and radiocarbon analyses of chicken bones from sites of Māori middens containing prehistoric material. The chickens belong to the widespread mitochondrial control region haplogroup E. Radiocarbon dating reveals that the bones are not prehistoric, but are still the earliest chicken remains known from New Zealand. Two of the bones pre-date permanent European settlement ( ca 1803s onwards) but overlap with the arrival of James Cook's second voyage (1773–1774), and, therefore, they are likely to be chickens, or progeny thereof, liberated during that voyage. Our results support the idea that chickens were first introduced to New Zealand by Europeans, and provide new insights into Māori uptake and integration of resources introduced during the early post-European period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsos.160258

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Remote Oceania, chickens arrived with people in Hawaii ~1200 CE, about 500 y prior to the earliest records of European introduction of poultry in Australia (1788 CE) and New Zealand (1773 CE).

    “In Remote Oceania, chickens arrived with people in Hawaii ∼1200 CE (36), about 500 y prior to the earliest records of the European introduction of poultry in Australia (1788 CE) (39) and New Zealand (1773 CE) (40).”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [4]Whistler WA 1991 Polynesian plant introductions. In Islands, plants, and Polynesians (eds Cox PA, Banack SA), pp. 41– 66. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press.
  2. [9]Matisoo-Smith E 2007 Animal translocations, genetic variation, and the human settlement of the Pacific. In Genes, language, & culture history in the southwest Pacific (ed. Friedlaender JS), pp. 157– 170. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. [22]McGovern-Wilson R, Kirk F, Smith I 1996 Small bird remains. In Shag River mouth: the archaeology of an early southern Māori village (eds Anderson A, Allingham B, Smith I), pp. 223– 236. Canberra, Australia: ANH Publications.
  4. [28]Tennyson AJD, Martinson P 2006 Extinct birds of New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Te Papa Press.
  5. [29]Worthy TH, Holdaway RN 2002 Lost world of the moa. Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury University Press.
  6. [48]Finney B 1994 Experimental voyaging and Māori settlement. In The origins of the first New Zealanders (ed. Sutton DG), pp. 52– 76. New Zealand: Auckland University Press.

Authors
Wood, J. R., Herrera, M. J. B., Scofield, R. P., & Wilmshurst, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ)
  • Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace Campus, South Australia 5005, Australia
  • Canterbury Museum (NZ)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Wood, Jamie R.
Venue
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2016-08
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
160258
ISSN
2054-5703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2480507838
Cited by
7
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Royal Society Open Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden
  • Crown Research Institutes from the New Zealand Ministry of Business
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
chickens, New Zealand, ancient DNA, radiocarbon dating, prehistoric animal remains, human-animal relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review