Cited by 28Livestock and Poultry ManagementGenetic diversity and population structureForensic and Genetic Research

East African origins for Madagascan chickens as indicated by mitochondrial DNA

Open access
Herrera, Michael B., Thomson, Vicki A., Wadley, Jessica J., Piper, Philip J., Sulandari, Sri, Dharmayanthi, Anik Budhi, Kraitsek, Spiridoula, Gongora, Jaime +1 more·2017·Royal Society Open Science

Abstract

The colonization of Madagascar by Austronesian-speaking people during AD 50–500 represents the most westerly point of the greatest diaspora in prehistory. A range of economically important plants and animals may have accompanied the Austronesians. Domestic chickens ( Gallus gallus ) are found in Madagascar, but it is unclear how they arrived there. Did they accompany the initial Austronesian-speaking populations that reached Madagascar via the Indian Ocean or were they late arrivals with Arabian and African sea-farers? To address this question, we investigated the mitochondrial DNA control region diversity of modern chickens sampled from around the Indian Ocean rim (Southeast Asia, South Asia, the Arabian Peninsula, East Africa and Madagascar). In contrast to the linguistic and human genetic evidence indicating dual African and Southeast Asian ancestry of the Malagasy people, we find that chickens in Madagascar only share a common ancestor with East Africa, which together are genetically closer to South Asian chickens than to those in Southeast Asia. This suggests that the earliest expansion of Austronesian-speaking people across the Indian Ocean did not successfully introduce chickens to Madagascar. Our results further demonstrate the complexity of the translocation history of introduced domesticates in Madagascar.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsos.160787

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The chicken's name in Malagasy has no roots in western Austronesian languages; linguistic elements in neighboring Comorian indicate a connection to Bantu, hence an introduction from coastal Africa, supported by close genetic affinity of Malagasy and East African chickens.

    “The chicken’s name in Malagasy has no roots in any of the western Austronesian languages. Instead, linguistic elements in neighboring Comorian indicate a connection to Bantu, and hence an introduction from coastal Africa (62), which is supported by the close genetic affinity of Malagasy and East African chickens (63).”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [63]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 28

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [18]Castillo C, Fuller D 2010 Still too fragmentary and dependent upon chance? Advances in the study of early Southeast Asian archaeobotany. In 50 years of archaeology in southeast Asia (eds Bellina B, Bacus EA, Pryce O, Weissman CJ), pp. 91– 111. London, UK: River Books.
  2. [21]Hall KR 1977 The coming of Islam to the Archipelago: a re-assessment. In Economic change and cocial interaction in southeast Asia (ed. Hutterer KL), pp. 213– 231. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan.
  3. [28]Adelaar A 2006 The Indonesian migrations to Madagascar: making sense of the multidisciplinary evidence. In Austronesian diaspora and the ethnogeneses of people in Indonesian archipelago: Proc. Int. Symp (eds Simanjuntak T, Pojoh IHE, Hisyam M), pp. 205– 235. Jakarta: Indonesian Institute of Science.
  4. [59]GenBank. See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/.

Authors
Herrera, M. B., Thomson, V. A., Wadley, J. J., Piper, P. J., Sulandari, S., Dharmayanthi, A. B., Kraitsek, S., Gongora, J., & Austin, J. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Indonesian Institute of Sciences (ID)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Gongora, Jaime
  • Austin, Jeremy J.
Venue
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2017-03
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
160787
ISSN
2054-5703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2600011618
Cited by
28
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Royal Society Open Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP110105187)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Livestock and Poultry Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
chickens, Gallus gallus, Madagascar, Indian Ocean, mitochondrial DNA control region, domestication history, East Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Arabian Peninsula, Malagasy people, prehistoric migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review