The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advancements in application of modified biochar as a green and low-cost adsorbent for wastewater remediation from organic dyes
Abstract
Synthetic organic dyes, which are resistant to biodegradation, pose a notable health risk, potentially leading to cancer and respiratory infections. Researchers have addressed this concern by exploring physicochemical methods to remove organic dyes from wastewater. A particularly promising solution involves modified biochar adsorbents, which demonstrate high efficiency in organic dye removal. Biochar, a charcoal-like material derived from biomass pyrolysis, offers advantages such as low cost, eco-friendliness, high efficiency and reusability. Beyond its role in sustainable soil remediation, biochar proves effective in removing organic dyes from wastewater after undergoing physical or chemical modification. Acid–base activation or metal–heteroatom impregnation enhances biochar's adsorption capacity. This comprehensive review examines the attributes of biochar, common methods for production and modification, and the impacts of raw materials, pyrolysis temperature, heating rate and residence time. It further elucidates the biochar adsorption mechanism in the removal of organic dyes, assessing factors influencing efficiency, including biochar feedstock, solution pH, adsorption temperature, particle size, initial dye concentration, biochar dosage and reaction time. It explores challenges, opportunities, reusability and regeneration methods of biochar in treating organic dye wastewater. It also discusses recent advances in organic dye removal using adsorption-based biochar. The review ultimately advocates for enhancing biochar's adsorption performance through post-modification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biochar has been promoted as a low-cost alternative to activated carbon.
“It has been promoted as a low-cost alternative to activated carbon.[7,8]”
From Biomass-Derived Biochar for The Removal of Textile Dyes from Aqueous Solutions: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review
Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., Vithanage, M., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2014) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071 · Cited by 4,662
Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: A review
Zhang, X., Gao, B., Creamer, A. E., Cao, C., & Li, Y. (2017) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.013 · Cited by 1,479 · cited 1×
“The alkali treatment enlarges micropores into mesopores by inducing carbon loss, creating a pathway for adsorbent transport, resulting in enhanced adsorption capacity [117,118].”
BackgroundEffectiveness and mechanisms of dye adsorption on a straw-based biochar
Qiu, Y., Zheng, Z., Zhou, Z., & Sheng, G. D. (2009) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.054 · Cited by 342
Distinct Approaches of Removal of Dyes from Wastewater: A Review
Bal, G., & Thakur, A. (2022) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.119 · Cited by 285
Preparation of Acid- and Alkali-Modified Biochar for Removal of Methylene Blue Pigment
Liu, C., Wang, W., Wu, R., Liu, Y., Lin, X., Kan, H., & Zheng, Y. (2020) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c03688 · Cited by 210
Ahmed, H. R., Hama Aziz, K. H., Agha, N. N. M., Mustafa, F. S., & Hinder, S. J. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d3ra04566h · Cited by 62
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 198
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117170 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2022.109015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104116 · DOI
- 10.1039/D3RA00723E · DOI
- 10.4172/2155-6199.1000e146 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10562-024-04628-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12403-022-00512-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.psep.2017.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jics.2022.100829 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109610 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120289 · DOI
- 10.1039/D4NJ00791C · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134967 · DOI
- Oladoye PO, Kadhom M, Khan I, Aziz KH, Alli YA. In press. Advancements in adsorption and photodegradation technologies for rhodamine B dye wastewater treatment: fundamentals, applications, and future directions. Green Chem. Eng. (doi:10.1016/j.gce.2023.12.004) · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116718 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114909 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2023.110568 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104054 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131314 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09632 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.wri.2023.100220 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cherd.2023.01.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102705 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scenv.2023.100033 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121115 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144094 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123764 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.202300256 · DOI
- 10.1039/D2RA07263G · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.160 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00289-021-03603-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012 · DOI
- 10.1081/SS-100100629 · DOI
- 10.1080/10643389.2017.1393263 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cis.2014.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.psep.2022.12.030 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2021.107017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100495 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122510 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100567 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126611 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151774 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121925 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11144-023-02519-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137222 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11356-023-31175-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-817742-6.00005-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.02.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140223 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.105303 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.09.063 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100339 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.envres.2018.09.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.047 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02711 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-0-323-85657-7.00009-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.072 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133464 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-819671-7.00006-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100578 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103366 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.01.074 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112665 · DOI
- Ngoc PK, Mac TK, Nguyen HT, Viet DT, Thanh TD, Van Vinh P, Phan BT, Duong AT, Das R. 2022 Superior organic dye removal by CoCr2O4 nanoparticles: adsorption kinetics and isotherm. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Dev. 7, 100438. (doi:10.1016/j.jsamd.2022.100438) · DOI
- 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.129009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jksus.2023.102630 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10924-022-02443-z · DOI
- 10.1039/D1RA08280A · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cherd.2023.09.048 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116486 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167685 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10311-018-0786-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ese.2022.100168 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cis.2016.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144484 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-023-50623-1 · DOI
- 10.1080/21655979.2023.2252157 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24722 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118939 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153956 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144204 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126128 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124532 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118581 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122435 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135544 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.joei.2024.101559 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2021.112056 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13399-020-01040-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112715 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.058 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127663 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105043 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121348 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122030 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142104 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.130 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105744 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2024.150387 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111492 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129783 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116448 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159037 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11356-020-09275-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104435 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126569 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121370 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128409 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105405 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101584 · DOI
- 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118841 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cis.2023.102890 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126327 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125542 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104112 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13201-023-01880-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2023.110947 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105951 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134893 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131301 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122842 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134847 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114157 · DOI
- 10.1080/15226514.2021.2021848 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104046 · DOI
- Chausali N, Saxena J, Prasad R. 2021 Nanobiochar and biochar based nanocomposites: advances and applications. J. Agric. Food Res. 5, 100191. (doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100191) · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.230 · DOI
- 10.1515/gps-2014-0071 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.135 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.093 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128108 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ces.2023.119129 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10098-023-02621-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124773 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126136 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121719 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106267 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2023.147131 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102626 · DOI
- 10.3390/nano13142045 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.131493 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144229 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128584 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122764 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2023.147334 · DOI
- 10.1080/10643389.2015.1096880 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121060 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.03.112 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.inoche.2022.109686 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124081 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124787 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.psep.2017.02.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117775 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.107 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129398 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100920 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13369-019-04194-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114297 · DOI
- De Gisi S, Lofrano G, Grassi M, Notarnicola M. 2016 Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 9, 10-40. (doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2016.06.002) · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121692 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.072 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122462 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104196 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1039/C8RA04290J · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.161 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.049 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cep.2022.109016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169035 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124199 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110438 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112568 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cjac.2023.100278 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115303 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10873 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2023.110986 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13399-021-01944-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2023.111761 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13399-021-02078-5 · DOI
- 10.1080/15422119.2021.1951757 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101138 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131421 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138088 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104377 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-023-39495-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11356-023-31489-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.132611 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125096 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101709 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomass-Derived Biochar for The Removal of Textile Dyes from Aqueous Solutions: A Review
Srijayathi, I., Boddupally, M., Qaiyum, M. A., & Ramesh, G. V. (2026) · EPJ Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202635602007
Metadata
- Authors
- Hama Aziz, K. H., Fatah, N. M., & Muhammad, K. T.
- Venue
- Royal Society Open Science
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2054-5703
- PMC
- PMC11285854
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
