The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relativity theory of plane waves
Abstract
Weyl has shown that any gravitational wave of small amplitude may be regarded as the result of the superposition of waves of three types, viz.: (i) longitudinal-longitudinal; (ii) longitudinal-transverse; (iii) transverse-transverse. Eddington carried the matter much further by showing that waves of the first two types are spurious; they are “merely sinuosities in the coordinate system,” and they disappear on the adoption of an appropriate co-ordinate system. The only physically significant waves are transverse-transverse waves, and these are propagated with the velocity of light. He further considers electromagnetic waves and identifies light with a particular type of transverse-transverse wave. There is, however, a difficulty about the solution as left by Eddington. In its gravitational aspect light is not periodic. The gravitational potentials contain, in addition to periodic terms, an aperiodic term which increases without limit and which seems to indicate that light cannot be propagated indefinitely either in space or time. This is, of course, explained by noting that the propagation of light implies a transfer of energy, and that the consequent change in the distribution of energy will be reflected in a cumulative change in the gravitational field. But, if light cannot be propagated indefinitely, the fact itself is important, whatever be its explanation, for the propagation of light over very great distances is one of the primary facts which the relativity theory or any like theory must meet. In endeavouring to throw further light on this question, it seemed desirable to avoid the assumption that the amplitudes of the waves are small; terms neglected on this ground might well have a cumulative effect. All the solutions discussed in this paper are exact.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, this includes the only conformally flat pure radiation solution of the Einstein-Maxwell equations with Φ 2 (u) = 1 2 A 2 e iϕ(u) in (15), namely the plane waves introduced by Baldwin, Jeffery [5] and Brdička [6]”
From Explicit Kundt type II and N solutions as gravitational waves in various type D and O universes (2003) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Alternatively, for a null field the solution is represented by the special pp -wave [5,6] discussed in section 3.1 ds 2 = 2 dζd ζ -2 dudv -A 2 (u)ζ ζ du 2 ,(A2)”
From Explicit Kundt type II and N solutions as gravitational waves in various type D and O universes (2003) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cited by
Explicit Kundt type II and N solutions as gravitational waves in various type D and O universes
Podolsk, J., & Ortaggio, M. (2003) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/9/307 · Cited by 61
Algebraically special Einstein–Maxwell fields
Van den Bergh, N. (2017) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-016-2171-x · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldwin, O. R., & Jeffery, G. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1926-05-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 757
- Pages
- 95-104
- ISSN
- 0950-1207
- 2053-9150
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relativity theory of plane waves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1926.0051
- The paper
- Baldwin, O. R., & Jeffery, G. B. (1926). The relativity theory of plane waves. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1926.0051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.