Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 530

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The theoretical prediction of the physical properties of many electron atoms and ions. Mole refraction, diamagnetic susceptibility, and extension in space

Open access
Pauling, Linus Carl·1927·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character

Abstract

It is customary to express the empirical data concerning term values in the X-ray region by introducing an effective nuclear charge Zeff.e in the place of the true nuclear charge Ze in an equation theoretically applicable only to a hydrogen-like atom. Often a screening constant S is used, defined by the equation Zeff. = Z — S ; and this screening constant is qualitatively explained as due to the action of electrons which are nearer the nucleus than the electron under consideration, and which in effect partially neutralise the nuclear field. Thus the relativistic or magnetic doublet separation may be represented by the equation Δv = Rα2/n3k(k — 1) (Z — s0)4 + ... This equation, including succeeding terms, was obtained originally by Sommer­feld from relativistic considerations with the old quantum theory; the first term, except for the screening constant s0, has now been derived by Heisenberg and Jordanf with the use of the quantum mechanics and the idea of the spinning electron. The value of the screening constant is known for a number of doublets, and it is found empirically not to vary with Z. It has been found possible to evaluate s0 theoretically by means of the follow­ing treatment: (1) Each electron shell within the atom is idealised as a uniform surface charge of electricity of amount — zie on a sphere whose radius is equal to the average value of the electron-nucleus distance of the electrons in the shell. (2) The motion of the electron under consideration is then deter­mined by the use of the old quantum theory, the azimuthal quantum number being chosen so as to produce the closest approximation to the quantum mechanics. (3) Since s0 does not depend on Z, it is evaluated for large values of Z, by expanding in powers of zi/Z and neglecting powers higher than the first, and then comparing the expansion with that of the expression containing Z — s0 in powers of s0/Z. The values of s0 obtained in this way* are in satis­factory agreement with the empirical ones, the agreement being excellent in the case of orbits of large excentricity, for which the idealisation of the electron shells would be expected to introduce only a small error.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1927.0035

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 530

Metadata

Authors
Pauling, L. C.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character
Published
1927-03-01
Volume
114
Issue
767
Pages
181-211
ISSN
  • 0950-1207 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9150
OpenAlex
W2150597297
Cited by
530
References
0
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The theoretical prediction of the physical properties of many electron atoms and ions. Mole refraction, diamagnetic susceptibility, and extension in space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1927.0035
The paper
Pauling, L. C. (1927). The theoretical prediction of the physical properties of many electron atoms and ions. Mole refraction, diamagnetic susceptibility, and extension in space. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.