Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The general sampling distribution of the multiple correlation coefficient

Open access
Fisher, R. A.·1928·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character

Abstract

Of the problems of the exact distribution of statistics in common use that of the multiple correlation coefficient is the last to have resisted solution. It will be seen that the solution introduces an extensive group of distributions, occurring naturally in the most diverse types of statistical investigation, and which in their mere mathematical structure supply an extension in a new direction of the entire system of distributions previously obtained, which in their generality underlie the analysis of variance. The individual distributions of this system were in each case obtained by the exact investigation of a particular problem. It was realised only gradually that many of these distri­butions, disguised by the different notations appropriate to different problems, were in reality equivalent, and could be made available in practice by a single system of tables. The remaining cases, with the notable exception of the correlation coefficient, then fall into place as particular limiting forms of a single general distribution. As the practical utility of these earlier solutions depends greatly on a recognition of their place in a single system, a very brief account of their mutual relationship may be given. The only statistic derived from samples of a continuous variate, of which the distribution was known before the present century, appears to be the arithmetic mean of a sample drawn from the normal distribution. In addition, however, two distributions which may be regarded as distributions of statistics had also been found, namely, Bernoulli’s binominal distribution, and Poisson’s series. Both of these distributions possess the property that the aggregate of the values of a sample is itself distributed in a distribution of the same type. In all three classical cases, therefore, the distribution of the statistic derived from a finite sample was known only by a mathematical simplification of this special type. In all other cases, approximations of unknown accuracy based on the use of the standard error and the assumption of normal distributions had perforce to be used.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1928.0224

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, R. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character
Published
1928-12-01
Volume
121
Issue
788
Pages
654-673
ISSN
  • 0950-1207 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9150
OpenAlex
W1987467732
Cited by
306
References
0
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The general sampling distribution of the multiple correlation coefficient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1928.0224
The paper
Fisher, R. A. (1928). The general sampling distribution of the multiple correlation coefficient. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1928.0224

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.